The URL can be used to link to this page

Otsego Township Incorporation Analysis August 1990IryA C Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. U R B A N P L A N N I N G D E S I G N M A R K E T R E S E A R C H 8 August 1990 , Otsego Town Board c/o Otsego Town Hall i34"l4 9�th Street NE t�,':Lk Kiver, Minnesota 55330 RE: Otsego - Incorporation Analysis F1Lk: i�0: 176.08 - 90.17 Gr�ntlemen: �ti7-su�,nt to your directive, our office serving as planners for Uts��;3c�, has prepared an analysis of the community in relation t�� the pr_�oposed incorporation of the jurisdiction. This rc�pc�r_t; r:res��nts a summary of the evaluation which has been conducted raa�d the t:i_ndinys and r.onclusions which have been reached. :[ hoJ_d p_rirnary responsibility for the direct prod;acti.on of thi.,, r:�port. i'he liritited support staff assistance which was uti_l.i.��ecl v,%�3s under my immediate supervision and control. As a r_Pstilt, �:ho'(I1�:� tl:e�_E' kie questions on the material which is ptesc:nted, 1" �:m pe:rsonally available to respond. Ve1.y truly yours, r;Ol'tTliT�dPS�� ASSOC�IA';l?F.D-._CANS . �, Javicl R. Li,.c 'tt, AT , �� r>rc: s iden L ' c�: .Jerome k7errault �I�ntc�s 13a.rL-hel F'1r; i_ne Bt�atty William Fadzwill LaYry KoshaY: NC. 4601 Excelsior Blvd. •Suite 410 •Minneapolis, MN 55416 • (612) 925-9420 •Fax 925-2721 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Executive .Summary .............................. 1 II. Introduction ................................... 3 III. Analysis ....................................... 6 A. Population .......................... ..... 6 B. Physical Environmental Features ........... 10 1. Quantity of Land ..................... 10 2. Topography' ........................... 11 3. Soils ... ..... ....... ... ... 11 a. Soil Suitability for Farmlands .. 11 b. Soil Suitability for Urban Development..................... 11 4. Wetlands�Ponding Areas ............... 15 5. Floodplain ........................... 17 6. Vegetation ........................... 17 C. Existing Development ...................... 19 1. Land Use ............................. 19 a. General ..... ............... 19 b. Rural�Agricultural .............. 21 c. Residential Land Use .......... 23 d. Public�Semi-Public Land Use ..... 24 e. Commercial Land Use ............. 24 f. Industrial Land Use ............. 25 g. Undeveloped Land ................ 25 2. Transportation ... .................. 25 a. Streets�Roads�Highways .......... 25 b. Rail Facilities ................. 28 c. Bus Service ..................... 29 d. Senior Citizen Transportation ... 29 D. Land Use Controls and Planning ............ 29 1. Building Permits�Code Enforcement .... 29 2. Subdivision .......................... 30 3. Zoning ............................... 33 a. General ......................... 33 b. District Application ............ 33 c. Zoning Ordinance Text ........... 40 d. Zoning Ordinance Update ......... 40 4. Land Use Plan ........................ 40 TAB�,E OF CONTENTS E. Governmental Services ..................... 44 1. Water and Sanitary Sewer ............. 44 2. Police Protection .................... 45 3. Fire Protection ...................... 45 4. Public Works ......................... 46 5. Administration ....................... 47 6. Library Service. ...................... 47 7. Parks ..... ................... 47 8. Governmental Buildings ............... 48 ,9. ,Recyling ............................. 50 F. Problems .. .. .. ....... ... ........ .. 50 1. Pollution/Environmental Problems and' Needed Services ... .. ............. 50 a. Ground Water Pollution .. ...... 50 b. Agricultural Preservation/� Protection .................:.... �52 c. Storm Drainage ... .... ......... 53 2. Other Urban Problems and Needs ....... 53 a. Housing and Environmental Blight 53 b. Tax Base ....... ............... 55 c. Land Use Harmony/Allocations .... 55 d. Transportation .................. 57 e. Park and Recreation Facilities .. 57 f. Schools ......................... 57 G. Fiscal Data ... ........................... 59 1. Assessed Valuation ................... 59 2. Homestead .........:.................. 59 3. Bonded Indebtedness .................. 59 4. Tax (Mill) Rates ..................... 59 H. Impact Upon Related Jurisdictions ......... 64 I. Adequacy of Township Structure ............ 65 J. Annexation by Others/Incorporation/ Partial Incorporation ..................... 66 K. Urban/Sub-Urban Character ................. 69 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The text of this report follows in order the incorporation evaluation criteria as specified by Minnesota State Statutes. This format has been utilized to insure complete and comprehensive coverage of all topics which are required to be part of the Municipal Board's decision. This organizational approach does not, however, necessarily provide a focused presentation which appropriately emphasizes the primary concerns which justify Otsego's petition for incorporation. As a consequence, this lead section,,of_ the report provides an Executive Summary of major points— organized in a more direct fashion and responding specifically to the reasons for Otsego gaining municipal status. It is stressed, however, that detailed explanation and documentation of these summary statements is provided in the subsequent topic areas addressed in the Analysis section of this report. In summary fashion, the following findings have. been made: 1. Otsego is urban and suburban in character. Its population, development densities, and resulting public service needs substantiate this classification. 2. Due to its geographic position and development stimulus such as TH 101 improvements, Otsego will continue to grow and urbanize. 3. There is need for local control and growth management. The basic organizational principals of tying authority with responsibility are an evident need. 4. Otsego faces critical and major environmental problems, notably in the area of ground water pollution, storm drainage, and agricultural preservation which are beyond the staffing and financial capabilities of Wright County and, if they are to be resolved, they must be confronted by the community itself. 5. Besides natural environmental problems spawn by dense development already noted, the community faces urban type difficulties such as housing and neighborhood deterioration, street construction and improvements, unbalanced tax base and the like. Again, it is only the community itself and a municipal form of government control which can address these matters. 6. There is a need for more direct responsiveness to citizens' needs than can be reasonably expected of Wright County. 1 7. A change to municipal status will allow the community to tap non -local funds•intended for urban scale problems and needs which are presently unavailable to the community but are critical for problem response. Two prime examples are state aid highway funds and shoreland management program grants. 8. A change from town_ to municipal status will not in and of itself increase property taxes. The property tax is reflective of services provided and while taxes and user fees may increase, such is a result of correcting existing problems and_ providing improvements and amenities characteristic of an urban setting. 9. •The community recognizes its predominant agricultural base and is aware of and will implement separate taxing jurisdictions so as not to burden rural areas with urban problems and their costs.. 10. There is a strong need to maintain the integrity of the present community boundary under unified local control. It is only through a coordinated and comprehensive growth management structure that a rural/urban service area can be created and maintained. This approach will limit unwarranted spread of urbanization, localize 'and focus development problems, minimize the cost of necessary services, preserve prime agricultural areas, and maintain the vitality of farming operations. 11. The Town and its Officials have evaluated the implications of municipal status and are prepared to take on the responsibilities implied. Substantial work has already been completed on preparing for such an event simply through efforts exerted towards resolving existing problems. 12. There is need both socially and economically for a community identity for Otsego. This can only be accomplished by gaining City status. 13. There is currently a lack of administrative powers and physical services and improvements which the township form of government precludes but which are needed for the health, safety, and general welfare of the community's residents. 14. No reasonable alternative, other than the incorporation of Otsego, exists for the organization and structuring of local government services and facilities necessary for the needs of�the existing and future residents of the community. 2 ., II.. ,INTRODUCTION Beginning primarily during the 1970s and continuing to the present, the Otsego community has experienced a substantial increase in development and population growth. With the 1990 population estimated at slightly below 6,000 persons, the Town ranks as the second largest local unit of government within Wright County. The City of Buffalo, which is the County Seat, is the only community having a larger population. _.________ The development and population. increases have brought with them changes in the community which have been both positive and negative. There has not, however, been an associated increase in local control and authority to respond to urbanization and govern growth management. Wright County still exercises final determination on most major decisions which affect Otsego. While County governance has been positive, the volume and extent of activity is placing a strain on County resources, personnel, and regulations for adequately addressing Otsego's needs. Such a situation is understandable given the County orientation to a rural setting. A need has become increasingly evident, therefore, for the Otsego community to gain more localized responsibility and authority in order to address community direction, to correct problems, and to manage growth and development. Although discussed for some time, consideration of changing from a Township form of government to a municipality was not serious pursued until early 1990. On 8 March 1990, a special Town meeting was held to consider this matter. Following a presentation of factors to be considered on whether or not the community should be incorporated, residents attending the meeting voted 121 to 87 in favor of a change in legal status. After further consideration, the Town Board on 21 May 1990 directed the filing of a petition for incorporation with the Minnesota Municipal Board. On 15 August 1990, the community will begin presenting its petition and the justification for incorporation to the Municipal board. As a means to organize and focus this effort, this report has been prepared. The format which has been followed in this report is based upon and in compliance with the specific criteria identified in Minnesota Statutes 414.02, Subd. 3 which lists factors which the Municipal Board is to consider in reaching its decision on the matter. In the material which follows, each specified decision -making factor is addressed in order of statute listing and factual information pertaining to the respective topic is provided. 3 --- --- � ; . �� o �, � � ��w .. �g � �s ; N � W N ag _ W E !0 _N N !� 6 ' L C �. ►- o a :�i:: •' •"I r � -- ' ' 1 LL 1 � _ _ ,�y� ' � -� Lj LL - --- �.,� J _L.�b. ..gyp � I� -, � J ' a r, I ''J�. ?� J � _ q �` ® i U �, � �- � -----�----;��:9.. .. -yam-�- ------ �_ __ � � � � � �� I �W I U S Z ��-� Z I J fi', I V r. � i F +.. . L. '` f I — �; —'— � — 1 �yyYi � �''f�qt f � 'Y'� \ U u a'! 2 �� 1 I < lU C .ice � C 'C �_ +r +�. � ��N �'(j � �O p i N� oa a w a L Q �� V/ 4 In compiling this report, a large number of resources were utilized. Many of these are independent documents which will require being entered as exhibits in the Municipal Board hearing. This report, however, consolidates the information which is available into a more concise and condensed summary. As a matter of record, the following i�s a list of the primary resources which are available and which were utilized as a basis of this document. Hakanson, Anderson Associates, Inc. (Town Engineers) Otsego�Community Facilities Study, August 1990 Otsego Comprehensive Plan -Policy Plan/Development Framework (Publication Pending) Otsego Town Clerk .Otsego Assistant Town Clerk Otsego Town Treasurer Otsego Township Comprehensive Plan Inventory, February 1990 Otsego Township Planning Tactics, April 1989 Twin Cities Metropolitan Council, Rural Area Issues Papers, May 1990 Wright County Assessor's Office Wright County Land Use Plan, May, 1988 Wright County Subdivision Ordinance, January, 1980 Wright County Zoning and Planning Office Wright County Zoning Ordinance, March 1986 III. ANALYSIS A. POPULATION: In summary, Otsego's past, present and projected population is as follows: 1960 1,080 1970 1,526 1980 4,76.9 1990 (Est) 5,835 1995 6,310 2000 6,780 2010 7,900 SOURCE: Otsego Comprehensive Plan -Inventory (February 1990) Between 1960 and 1990, Otsego's population grew from 1,080 to an estimated 5,835. Of the 4,755 individuals added over this 30 year period, 1,066 or 22.4 percent came to Otsego since 1980. The increased growth is typical of the communities just northwest of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. Growth has been considerable in Otsego since 1970 with increases substantially higher than surrounding Monticello, Frankfort, Hassan�Lovinia Townships. Population increases in Otsego have outpaced increases experienced by some surrounding cities such as Big Lake, Albertville, St. Michael and Rogers. Otsego's percentage growth changes closely resemble changes experienced by the City of Elk River. Otsego's population growth can be seen to during the decade of the 1970s. Prior to relatively small population was growing at Since that time, the population has expande an average annual increase of 324 people a higher sustained growth rate than experienc At present, approximately 55 percent population is located in platted areas and of the balance are on large lot divi agricultural in use (see Existing Land Use Town's growth patterns have been influenc and proximity to the Twin Cities area. Add be implied between patterns of growth in patterns of growth occurring in Otsego. River experienced modest growth between 19 have "changed course" that time, the Town's a fairly modest rate. d considerably showing nd assuming a slightly ed between 1960-1970. of the community's a substantial portion sions which are non - Map on page 20). The ed by both its access itionally, a link can Elk River and similar Both Otsego and Elk 60-1970 and a surge of growth between 1970-1980. Between 1980-1988, growth rates tapered off to slightly higher rates than experienced between 1960-1970. [� << ,, m , 1. N �� l ® � OI �y r: u u N � qqp�� -t�LL /��J �W n7�< rn�v) •� U O z � W ��N �� w./•_. �'-- a N � � . -.-' U soNiw+va apse N ;o ® �� 0 ® � � .. •{ ��P M lo-� • s�c�, , ✓ F,� '' tM1l': 5� r - �— � ^ � m 0 � )u� �" 31vn0 AV AVOVnO / �..:.: N ww,° K"^� W '� 'anv Nosavd � � /' ! % p � M��. ::: �. is �`...1 ::'ic n1 NV300 M ` :: .. +;;. ✓. ; :; :: .. � o 3 e ;:::: � .. lI ;;: > ;: +I � .�y 000Mxvo I'+ � � ! 6 III1 :i:•i�<•? N � � N N Ni r N ` � / '". '3Av VnHSVN 3/`V VnHSVN F o f � r 5 M� �, � Yo�N i. F )y � v ` h •anv adlsmvow �� +�\ v1 '3AV NOSVw � .� O .— '� ` � 17 � 17 in � � 5 c � n o +o �o • � �anv 3Molavw __ '3nv aani ovv� +� '3AV NONNdI i �� i (� c 3N )( �-�7f1iY) � N m N � r,7„ �, .,S � I I� �� N N p , `� y 1, n � �\_ i / �' W � :i: ii:;i r J�..� J��% : <' xnv3e r'1 'anv xnvae v� 1 (l 7 �• °� � � r � v�i � J �\ •••1HVN a31HVN N N o �M .;,-)� i oro �` t. :.rassati:�. as lov>, •anv a3�avN 2 So � o \1I � to N� N o M e v� \� aoe yr '3nv a3oivr 2~ � c, ` a3olvr N 0° "' i =v,v n]trn• 15a aievr �� 7 m W Q w a V C � N � tC � W � � � 'C 0- r C ca 0 0 0� � � � �— r r rn 0 rn a s N C 3 �TT V/ N Gi Based upon analysis which has been conducted and is summarized in the Otsego Comprehensive Plan Inventory (February 1990), the community's 1990 population is estimated at 5,835. This estimate is reflective of 327 new housing units constructed in Otsego during the 1980s and an expectation that the Town has retained its large household size of 3.41 persons per unit (Wright County averages 2.88 persons per unit). A major factor is projecting the population growth in Otsego centers on the issue of whether public utility services, primarily sanitary sewer, will be provided. Should such an event take place, the pace of development would be expected to increase. On a conservative basis, however, an analysis has been conducted which assumes no public utilities. As such, without public utilities, the Town will be limited to low density single family development. The expanded employment base of the western metropolitan suburbs should, however, help to maintain residential development interest in Otsego. It is anticipated that .Otsego should be able to maintain an annual average minimum ,ate<.,-,,.-.r�moni- ra�f-o „f �� a�.,A� � ;,,R „n; t� ner year through the vear 2000. This development rate and a slightly declining household size should result in a year 2000 population of approximately G,800 residents. POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLD TRENDS AND PROJECTIONS 1980 1988 1990 1995 2000 2010 Population 4,769 5,767 5,835 6,310 6,780 7,900 Households 1,398 1,697 1,725 1,890 2,055 2,450 Household Size 3.41 3.39 3.38 3.33 3.30 3.22 SOURCE: 1980 U.S. Census Otsego Building Permit Information 1980-1989 Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. S The table below transforms the projections of the preceding table into unit additions, gross percentage changes, and effective compounded annual percentage growth rates. Noting this, it is apparent that while the volume of growth will remain fairly constant, the portion of the base (or percentage increase) represented by these units of additional growth will decline. PROJECTED POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLD UNIT ADDITIONS, GROSS PERCENTAGE CHANGES AND EFFECTIVE (COMPOUNDED) ANNUAL PERCENTAGE GROWTH RATES 1970-80 1980-90 1990-2000 Unit Additions Population 3,243 1,066 945 Households 950 327 330 Gross Percentage Changes Population 212.5 22.4 16.2 Households 217.9 23.4 19.1 Effective (Compounded) Annual .Percentage Population 12.0 2.0 .9 Households 12.6 2.2 1.7 SOURCE: Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. October 1989 Otsego Building Percent Data 1980 U.S. Census In conclusion, the following findings are noted relative to Otsego's population projections. o Otsego growth is projected to remain fairly constant through the year 2000. o While volume of growth is anticipated to remain constant, it will represent an increasingly smaller portion of Otsego's growing base population. The percentage of increase will be lower and lower farther into the future. 0 o The land availability with _O.tsego and the community's proximity to an expanding employment base in western metropolitan suburbs provides an attractive incentive for continued population and household growth. o The Otsego projections are based on rural suburban development densities. Many factors could contribute to a more dramatic community growth. Factors including major transportation system improvements, the introduction of a major employer to the area, or the availability of public utilities could result in greater development interest in the community and therefore a faster growth and development rate. B. PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENTAL FEATURES 1. Quantity of Land: Otsego is approximately 30 square miles in size with the predominant geographic use of land being agriculturally related. The following table summarized the present land use in the community 1989 LAND USE BREAKDOWN Percent Acreage Of Total Urban Residential (0-1 ac) 92 0.4 Suburban Residential (1-2.5 ac) 1,029 5.4 Suburban Residential (2.5-5 ac) 455 2.3 Rural Residential (5-10 ac) 295 1.6 Semi -Public 10 0.1 Public 159 0.8 Commercial 49 0.3 Railroad 18 0.1 Public Right -of -Way 780 4.1 Vacant�Undeveloped 552 2.9 Rural�Agricultural 15,085 79.2 Lakes�Rivers 499 2.6 TOTAL 19,023 100.0 SOURCE: Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc., 1989 Further details and an explanation of land use will occur in the next section of this report. 10 2. Topography: The overall topography of Otsego can be roughly characterized as fairly hilly in the southeastern and northwestern "corners" of the Town and fairly level throughout the remainder. As noted on the following illustration, these areas generally contain slopes three areas slopes of 12 3. Soils: near 85th percent or over 12 percent or more. There are and Nashua Avenue that also have greater. a. Soil Suitability for Farmlands: While it should be recognized that any large scale mapping of soil suitability for farmlands results in an extremely generalized graphic statement, the map on page 13 does serve to illustrate some of the interrelationships between soils and farm lands that are considered significant for the production of agriculture products. Predominant soil types within Otsego are composed of prime farmlands and additional farmla�zd of State wide importance. The prevalence of these soil types suggest that agricultural activities will remain an important land use throughout the Town. Conservation of significant farmland should be a defined policy goal within the Comprehensive Plan to help Otsego deal with future development pressures. It should be noted that the farmlands map represents a broad generalization and as such, should be used only to discuss the relationships between other, more specific, development factors such as soil types and topography, etc: b. Soil Suitability for Urban Development: Soil types commonly found in Otsego have been grouped into three cohesive categories (as illustrated on the map on page 14) to facilitate identification and simplify discussion regarding their distinctions. The following list of applicable from the 1980 U.S. Geological Survey the soil types as illustrated on map. soils were obtained and correspond to the following soils 11 T rn l iJ ® � � )- 'l. of yyJ� N F ;i. ® � ��iijj ISp W T yF flfl I�y1 }a� f' .� -� k� W � i � 7 rn � N yr Pip®♦� � Z °�W �� per I o'i\_.l �� -_ SONI'NiVa P+L'4 1 OPO � �n . � h � ; DPP M T ` � \ `\ �\\ / rC,, ` �° " � � Vi � � o V, iPF1 —� �) `� M � S e o \ / . � tug i— � 3'�Yflb " G, i a �P d Z y `„ ...�.+ _�\�\�\� '3nV NOSaViT\ & J 1 \ .� 1 I "+ z 1 3�V OaVNOVd \ �-. i. / ;� /� `:I �' I of �I i d + e �„� � e t'+ ~� d �.� l� "♦ i OOOMNVO l � ) G^ Op l C d �� 1 �I 1 0i � 1 r N• '34'� /nHSVN '34V YfV�i/N v~i � � O J \ j � i � LC+ h � 3nv a�sm�tory / �r \ 1 m '3nV NOSVW \ i m\ �- o o,l_ Y of /�`� � � i:'3nv 3xo'lavry �� .. —'' I� %/�� 1 a0 '3nV- tf3nt bvN ,i J � � O � 1 � \ \ '3tiV NONIEYI i � II I � � � \ � \ � \ \ 3N 7 � i)nfi> o� S 1 \� /fn \B � � J; ' / ; i t� � �-w � 1 1 -� xnv3a vi y '�V� iV38 )Y1 �11' �'' ��r'. ��. f I l` \ f 1 I �i• H \ v ` \;('�,(// \ {- /�J N In ryaiHv>, a3itivN, \ .(� �\ '" ("1 5 r� .\.� l �i. C \� w n "'� in �\ � O\ 1 � I 't' a31�; �� 00 \ i o l � 'O \ o \ �\ � \ .t ?� � � �• � 'aoer+vr � � ) �� —(""� � � •` ( a3owr � N '� c= ... � � c �� N � � N'V � 30 Qm � �U, W a O d . � C C�1 � •� .V. O d � LL � . N (3 r N t0 � V V � �. d CA L Cn � r: f� d C Q> ZT N a 0 ffJ Y \V ' O 0 12 •� ri�sroN — t�41`: �I`i:IV'V-1 N �� w N r �� `� �_ '� � 6i s w 4. (, O Z aW �� ~� N �� _ � N ��rt �/ ,< ,1<1�, i i �, f3 c= .�; d C �� N� ��N �'(j 0 m s�V � oa a +� �. a� 0 c �C C +y+ � a E � �, 'J 3 c o � �.� � o E � � U 'K co � _ o a � � � ,_ a � .c 3 a o 0 a� �`�� 0 »- o a� o �° � c � � � m �v E `o E c co � E u. o � � ro � � � v_ c o ,3 0 — m � +� a` Q � Q � ui �.. 11. ';��V HJIIV i' !� 13 I-,d <, II�� < ® p„ z � � N _ � � � w N � ff�� ~O n W J �W �i� N�jtn U � a �N. � � �� I— � �� N ®� r � ::.: r• .. �'•.•�' • dir:�..�•�: ':�. �{ .� .,,y. ♦. ;� . �t� :�, ♦. �. <••: ' ?? i t .'N :.� �, .,,�.+ .o .i . ,/ � $ti <.. ::?�: ` ��ly.i ��: .•N':::.1n :•:::.'.'.'. V: � ': � . ' i �s: :;�;• �: s �: >:�>�' . r� ,,,.�,,, � :� �: �'� � �,E4: •: "^,' };KfN;eO: 5;:1:� �:;:;: ::::�y1!:XItYi�::V1;: ;:;: . a3s�,,H--1� ``�1_ ,r i >: '�! ,•, :�� ,k2 ?ti31�:N ? •}: •{, :'if.' :.�;r t.. •:� i�. N. \:{r :•}. .:%•" C•i f. . };p' ..� �'' 't�:\.� ..� i+• .rr j.f :�::;::' :;::;; :�ti / :>Iti•'. ��:. :r1• c:> �.fi.• .•�:: ..G' ...... .. 'a4V a3o'+ ,. .lAtl i17HVl' << , �, t:� . �: 1- ,l. U L1 `_ —_ �V i , /� _•. v. �SLHdf!19YC22 P�L'4 ,o� ,L U t, w cp r- RS O N d C C . C 7 O = U o +• � °' .` �U C O '++ N y C � Q � O .0 C � tC y � � 't7 � Q � N 0 �• cu Q � � � a cv .. � � ,n o' C N = N 7 N � Q J � i � C m ai ►. •V•� z z w o:Q;. .{ ;kt,:. 14 o Hayden-Dundas-Peat Association This soil association is located primarily in the Town's southwestern corner, making up roughly two- thirds of the soils in Otsego. The association is gently rolling and has many flats and depressions. High susceptibility to frost heave, high shrink -swell potential and normally high seasonal water table severely limit the use of these soils for most types of urban development. o Hayden -Lester -Peat Association This association occupies strongly rolling and hilly areas along the northern and eastern part of Otsego. These soils have moderate to severe constraints for use as building sites because of this shrink -swell potential, the frost heave potential and the problems with the slopes. o Esterville-Hubbard-Kadena Association This association primarily borders the Mississippi River with nearly level or undulating slopes. The major obstacle to urban development is the rapid permeability of the soils. There is a high hazard of pollution to underground water supplies when these soils are used for on -site sewer absorption fields. Steep .slopes .also result in limitation to urban development. Urban development has primarily been concentrated in the northeast corner of the Town and in spot locations throughout the remainder of Otsego. This is an area of extreme concern for "urban" scale development as it relates to soils and potential ground water pollution. 4. Wetland�Ponding Areas: Otsego contains a number of wetland marshy areas and depressions which serve as ponding areas for excess storm water runoff during certain seasons of the year (refer to map on page 16). These areas are valuable for their role in floodwater retention, groundwater recharge, nutrient assimilation, livestock watering, and aesthetics. Also, they provide a natural habitat for waterfowl and other wildlife. The wetland areas adjacent to Rice Lake and Odell Avenue provide a valuable natural habitat for wildlife and fowl. The marshes, wetlands and ponding areas also provide a natural system for managing storm water runoff. Storm water drainage in Otsego has been handled by natural drainage swales and by man-made ditches located along the Town's streets and roads. Otsego has, however, experienced major drainage problems in the past, primarily in the form 15 �' i.' thl`.:.1''iS1Ap1 .� co a NN n " �Y' v In v ® M � O 3lVnb P�f4 tUl vavno H "\ •3nv Nosavd ; N A "z �� ,'•' , N c N o i 3GV OaVNOVd �"� N Nv300 � �'h 4 �7 � .a,... ¢- t 1 /y�' � �V r � N 1 N 1/" V VnNSVN '3AV V VN N o 5 5 d 1, • O1 n i F- ^ N '. Icj S � � ��♦��'3A a31SIllVOW t � 1 h � V .— y � ... �anv ynoiavW .r '0 a3ni ovW � __ _ � '' \ O ''3AV NONNVI .1 1 v: i r) 'd' S � r- 0 -` N N ;ii ' r � � < < � VI N l U '^ � n i �� z °i "i�� , < xnv3e n •3nv xnva v� i13SP7N__ .rL._ c V 1 ,' °� � o M a3lHVN a3lNVN � S fi ro �' N3'IOVN •� '3�Y d3l0YN W � � ~ t� 2 O u V �` Y m a � N 1 � � N � N H �� N �{�, 9 �l e aaowr 1 � I � � �0J '3�V �.113`JI' � :1`�Y 211UVI' i� OOOMNVO ' a3lOVN 1~/1 '�� M e V ��.. i r u) ci . c- .��. c v `.,�° � .� .� N � � �'(j � m � NC, � La a u� a 0 rn r a� .. '^� N f�i U ,� Q w� W .. a ci Z o � � i fn t.. '�� to .� c � a � C C � N � O ++ c0 O �. � 41 � �' Q LL W ^`� C W V ` � � � O ~2 0�.. � Z " ® � I.. 16 of storm water overflow. These drainage issues may become more pressing as additional development takes place. It can be anticipated that these problems will continue and possibly intensify unless a comprehensive storm water management plan is developed and implemented to control seasonal drainage problems. 5. Floodplain: Also noted on the map on page 16 are the areas identified within the 100 year flood zone according to the National Flood Insurance Program. It is apparent from the map that areas within the 100 year flood boundary follow the course of the Mississippi River. Otsego's Floodplain Zoning District was created for the purposes of protecting public health and safety and to minimize property damage and pollution from flood waters. Boundaries for the Floodplain District are illustrated on the map on page 16 and are outlined on Federal Flood Insurance maps. In addition to the Floodplain District, Otsego has an established Wild and Scenic River Zoning District. The purpose of this District is to protect and preserve the scenic, recreational, natural and historical values of the Mississippi River in Wright County by carefully controlling development of this river corridor consistent with the State Wild and Scenic River Act and Minnesota Regulations NR 78- 81. 6. Vegetation: The existing natural vegetation is identified on the map on page 18. Within Otsego, areas having flatter topography contain relatively few massings due to its continuing farm utilization. The large tree massings appear to be interspersed within. areas located along the Mississippi River or are scattered throughout the Town in selected areas. While vegetation clearly provides a unique character and adds substantially to the existing desirable qualities of Otsego, the majority of land in the Town is void of significant tree massings. 17 l;,lr l.;;lrc�l � �;�. Lm i+Sj �;_. P i, ' � tf1 re'. ,�Y.1 � .� H� l Q, tjry', 4 i t D �j'�, � ' v r -- -• i ci � a. � � N + H - ' I �•� 11 A G f� \ y a3lHV>t a31HVN ��: t� ,y C �' a.�IOVN W ~ ¢ {�� rJ'� a r�l�jt P � � �. ♦� t' �� ,.� i. �•` �--�� =$ra =� aoeWvlG ., � c; '` a30lVf �' 31�V a3`P+f D+f S / f. / N (O �^ In o a _ __ � a' N N t7 � r O .- 0 10� o �� 31vn0 �V AVOVf10 ;1:� :��:5+. �a �1 �jly N N �4 N '•� rA �. N Nvaao G 6 N Of '^ ''ahY vnHSVN +��j�'o r. ��, ,q S k• � C'.E1.:� :r�� ut �`++� o �3AV NOSYW � �a�V a31SIllVOW O � �anv aMolavry �;; •anv aanl ovW 3��gNNVI h '�[r _� N � N 1° m s yy'`'y1i N N '� n �t.4t�.� � L h F� .� F xnv3e vl 'anv xnv3e vl {;%� M r' N ��' �' -., � N � to •+�:t.. to 0 n �P� ao '�i i*r� �� anv a3lOVN S��i+ !!` Ea:t:.Y ut .:s 1' N � �: ..,�, r �� N w N_�p 3�V a3D'I�t< � wd Q� J � � 0 J �r, •and oavNovd � '�x r; .' R s;. -> �� >�� N p0 v L C+ r � �O OooMNVO �•2r "' �:�r �Y l � n u ..1r,V alUVf i� �. V;1`.� (�` J �� ,,Y va C w .1� fr � � � a� �'<j � o �� Qom, O Q W a J C. EXISTING DEVELOPMENT 1. Land Use: a. General The map on page 20 depicts the present land use patterns of Otsego. Patterns of land use presently existing in Otsego and uses still developing show the influence of several important factors. These factors include the rapid growth of suburban residential development in the northeast corner of the Town, and clustered urban suburban development along the County Road 39 corridor, Highway 101 corridor and Mississippi River. Otsego's development pattern demonstrates a concentration of growth that has occurred in close proximity to the City of Elk River. The most highly concentrated urban suburban growth is located in the northeast quarter of the Township where access to Elk River and major road systems are convenient. Both Otsego and the City of Elk River have experienced similar population growth patterns suggesting that Otsego's proximity to Elk River and major road systems are interrelated. The location of major transportation routes .has affected the growth patterns in both communities, with Otsego and Elk River becoming "bedroom" communities for commuters working in the Metro Area and Elk River. Further expansion in the northeast corner of the Town, however, is being closely monitored to guarantee expansion takes place in an orderly manner pursuant to present policies. Future land use patterns can be expected to reflect previous patterns with new development in filling vacant areas adjacent to existing subdivisions and taking place along major thoroughfares. In spite of urban expansion, Otsego remains highly agricultural with 79.2 percent of the Town's geographic area still in cultivation or involved in some other farm activity. It is anticipated that much of the land currently in cultivation or farm activity will remain in that pattern of land use. Precaution is being exercised with future development concepts so that intrusion on agricultural areas can be minimized. 19 Z� rn '` -. N ,' i`,, ® � � � �aw� ri .r� � � ��W U U R � i LL W oC gs`w �zo „ gom s>3ti d�� V O W sF' �v'J,'a uwi�¢ �� : a u, �s� < U i n z I SONI'NSVi! f 0'6' _ � N �a ® < <<< R PD � t ® i.� • • < Leo � I < \�. < �' < < < < ' < N < < is �.' < N b 1- < �� < < < - < < < < < alvno < _ < < nv Avavne < < < . .: �: < - < '3n tlNOVd < ^ < < g < � a i:j < ,r} N < < r z $ � < _ � < S < ' �< < �. ` a :. n` `< �� 0 ��IhNVO < < ~ � ^< < < ,.,.:......... ..:: �s ........... �. y. < < .-- < ..an' VN ��SVN N o. < � � n m < < < � < •'b�Y < d ti < � < < V~•1 [ 4 [ < < < < v < < < � < � 3nv aaisnlv�w < < o� < < ?k, nv OSVw O �/ < � < < I� < r M N < +� n '3nV 3v,OltlVw < < < 1O < < < '3nv a3ni vw < < < < <8 < < 3hV NO �� `.� 1 I< ;� ur 3N I� � y i � < 1.'I � < VI < N p � .4 � a <� < < Si /�?, <z �� < < � f' 1 < < (D F /: Tilly N < < o < � < < < � < 't. ... �..,.. •m < < < ,�._ < 'c NJ'IOVN N3lOVN 2< i r < • ...w < H <� a w < < Q? 3lOV� . S O < L V < < < Q ZO < < Y � '� u � < < T N < O < � < < N m < � r7 '" rs" ,' , , <' N < � < ao©wvr < < �' " < <� i13 < [ < N < 0J< < U a C � � �� Qi � ��N �•U O o ��U W oa a a l_. W 0. 6, � U `m a E v � c E •— m U a' iq > �o®a U U l9 N � � _ to N U � � � � � N O. � N �- � � � � Q � � � Gl � �• � � = y C C N N N t0 a � .a a � U 7 7 �p •` (0 � � � a � � �n � aooa 'W'A VJ ■ Y N Z3 �� `��`jj . W � 20 The specific breakdown by land use type is as follows: 1989 LAND USE BREAKDOWN Urban Residential (0-1 ac) Suburban Residential (1-2.5 ac) Suburban Residential (2.5-5 ac) Rural Residential (5-10 ac) Semi -Public Public Commercial Railroad Public Right -of -Way Vacant�Undeveloped Rural�Agricultural Lakes�Rivers TOTAL SOURCE: b. Acreage 92 1,029 455 295 10 159 49 18 780 552 15,085 499 19,023 Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc., Rural�Agriculture Land Use Percent Of Total 0.4 5.4 2.3 1.6 0.1 0.8 0.3 0.1 4.1 2.9 79.2 2.6 100.0 1989 The most predominate land use geographically in Otsego is agricultural farming activities comprising 79.2 percent of the Town's total acreage. Based on the Wright County Soil Survey, much of Otsego can be considered prime agricultural land. The current pattern of farm types in Otsego includes a number of agricultural modes. This is the result of a mixed pattern of land suitability as well as a changing economy relative to urban markets. The distribution of predominant farm types is illustrated on the following map. Dairy cattle farming is concentrated in the west and central portions of the Township, while crop farming predominates throughout. Production of beef cattle and hogs are more limited and are concentrated in pocket areas between areas of crop and dairy farming. There are only a limited number of "hobby farms" in Otsego. Farm sizes are largest in the northwestern. areas, ranging up to 200+ acres. Somewhat smaller acreages are found in the central, and western districts, with predominantly 40 to 120 acre operations throughout the remainder of Otsego. 21 �. .- � 0 6 .� N � �i U i:� �� n W oc �pp�y�� J � W ft 2 � Z rn cn .� i 'ggm � " QUA �5. O z i W �� w `� ^� v7 $ � — s5wvnva N �� .:..: °P° �'. -- - • ,s�`�e- r e` n M1,1.51�,°IFPI I � •� � N N. �3nv vnHSva '�v rfy�r '� r f••,! � ,I '� ..; m 'env rigcvr+'•'..°°•' • � , �• '� � 'r� 3ti0�avw �,.. ,✓ ar�r..l. ^.v: .. 3�d aJovr P�CS � �'' Nfj m O .� � o log �vri� .AV'.xyarnb: •�;y,rioS9vd � � M n�%r�� j7�aVN9Yd tea, .�:Nv340 fry o ,� k k—"" .000MHvo ,' r ;�'. �� ' 'r, y� a� yAr' �` � � .. .� o + M yr •�, r /� �u �' .•��•. a W a to c`Q tJ. A O O _ _ U . C ... .;� q' C �� a� N�� '(j � � oV L� � r_ a� y � � i � N U U a � w- 'R � � U. � m rr� � � r. Q ...� !� r(�{�� ,��It, �1'�� ,i``; ��2°Q• `fir IJ,vN •' . rk � r J, 7rry a7ki\'I' . '�i 00 rn T S]. .0 N H O d N 0 v O �G Residential development has consumed land previously utilized for agricultural purposes. The sporadic residential development pattern also tends to interrupt this homogeneous pattern of agricultural activities. Since �1980, 327 new housing units were constructed. Based on the density breakdown of the Town, this new development consumed approximately 1,365 acres of land. c. Residential Land Use Residential land use occupies nearly 10 percent of Otsego's total land area. The predominate residential type is single family homes and mobile homes. Over 80 percent of Otsego's housing stock has been built since 1970. A survey of housing conditions reveals that while the majority of housing stock is structurally sound, various neighborhoods revealed the need 'for housing improvements and maintenance to enhance the general character of the area. Without available public sewer, Otsego's residential development has been low density with lot sizes ranging from one to ten acres in size. The primary concentration of development has occurred in large subdivisions located in the northeastern portion of the Town. The subdivisions platted in the mid 1970s provided help facilitating Otsego's strong growth during this period. The balance of the Town displays a sporadic development pattern with small clusters of residential lots interspersed within agricultural areas. This "shotgun" pattern of development interrupts the contiguous pattern of farming activitie s and encumbers the previously segregated agricultural uses. Otsego's mobile home residential land use is concentrated within the east central part of the Town in three subdivisions and in one mobile home park with the remaining mobile homes scattered throughout the Township on single parcels. There are three mobile home subdivisions located in Otsego: Vasseurs Oak Grove Estates, 1st-4th Additions, Walesch Estates, lst and 2nd Addition, and Praught's Addition. The River Bend Mobile Home Park is the only mobile home park in Otsego and is located near the intersection of Highway 101 and River Road. The older mobile home subdivisions show signs of deterioration with regard to both structural and site appearance. Except for the one mobile home park, only low density residential development is found in the community. Medium and high density type residential land use, in the form of townhomes and apartment buildings, have not developed within the Town. Multiple family housing is closely tied to urban service and is not anticipated unless urban service becomes available. d. Public and Semi -Public Land Use A limited amount of -land area in Otsego is devoted to public and semi-public uses (approximately .9 percent of Otsego's total acreage). This use category includes parks, governmental buildings, churches, cemeteries, and semi-public utilities (telephone, electricity, etc.). The basic service orientation of land uses in the category is reflected in the correspondence of its distribution to that of residential land use. e. Commercial Land Use Commercial land use consists of only .3 percent of the total land use in Otsego with the greatest concentration of commercial land use in Otsego located around principal and minor arterials. Development along State Highway 101 and along County Road 39 area encompasses the most intense and diverse commercial activity with the bulk of Otsego's retail and service commercial land use. i For the most part, commercial land use is typified by individual establishments oriented to major intersections or to residential. developments in the form of "convenience commercial" operations. Mississippi Shores 6th Addition has the highest concentration of commercial land use located at the corner of County Road. 39 and Northeast Parish Avenue. Commercial activity in this area includes a child care center, a video .rental store, a liquor store, a convenience grocery store and a mini -golf course. Mississippi Shores 6th Addition has three commercial zoned parcels still vacant at this time. Commercial use also includes a conference center development located on County Road 39 near the Island View and Arrowhead Estates subdivisions. Other commercial development includes an auto sales 'lot and a gas station food market located along State Highway 101. 24 f. Industrial Land Use At this time, there are no "formal" industrial land uses within Otsego, although some scattered home occupations would likely qualify as industrial in character. Industrial land use in Otsego has been tied closely to the provision of urban service and is not anticipated to develop until such time as sewer and water facilities may become available. g. Undeveloped Land The undeveloped land identified in the land use breakdown table and as illustrated on the land use map has been subdivided for development, but remains vacant. The immediacy of the prospects for development on these parcels varies considerably and are closely tied to the current climate in the housing market, interest rates and other variables. Certain identified parcels within Meyer Addition, Island View Estates and other areas have been platted for sometime without complete development, however, as the housing market variables change, residential concentrations are more likely to be "filled in". 2. Transportation: a. Streets�Roads�Highways While Otsego does contain a number of transportation modes, primary emphasis is on the street and highway system. The significance of these existing and developing networks in terms of economic social and recreational considerations makes them a central concern. The functional classification system for the Town's streets and highways, developed by the Minnesota Department of Highways, is illustrated on the map on page 26. The functional classification system is based on anticipated usage from five to ten years in the future and is constructed consistent with standards for MnDOT's functional classification system. This classification system has considerable impact on funding assistance and design criteria for future network improvements, especially in regard to state and county funding and administration. The growth of population within the Town has been accompanied by increases in the volume of traffic carried by streets and highways. The map on page 27 shows traffic volumes for major thoroughfares in Otsego for 1984 and 1988. In almost every case, the 1988 25 re 1 ��' Y \,1 %i I i � a r s vs :n' ' 3j t � �I /�'1' !13'.i Iv Y --� �� ..� 1` 1 \� v' ; J/�tl 21J�IVr- '- w N rn �' o � � rn �� r� w r u. cn S � J � W a��i �O o � iw �,�� w Q � � � m3� U � ��a . � _ � '� d�' ,JAV 21J lIV I' I.. `u d N v � V v � N 0 m � O p U � r r r r • }; fi�J sl c 0 '� m .• 0 a c t0 O a d RS *+ O N d C C V I L 26 �. ; �- :� c� �' •i ® Of � �� u N obi lS� }� •• J pC � 3 � y� ~ � 'v� 1 W� /V� � o m < � y � V � �V W � � ( I t P— V � Y . `:l�:�}:� .�' soNlvlva wre � N ' '�}.� � �.�,, G >�: �:po c� a 1.� ':�:::;t 5;:� :; p) i:i��i�: ��yy .' �•.'.j :�':�''::•: N N f�.`•ii�i :i.,T,;.•fi i -�IS.IPPI •.iT!+. i�i�li; ._.`"", N '° o i�i�:'fi'''i �:'•�' O �... ; � IUD _.� :;:�Q: .Lii3i 3 E;�:r:2•:'�, �.a..,. •:'i T;.`'T''i '3�!1Xi:;NQS.?1!{'d � J ...� p �� •'��••�� :::i rise..: . ...,.;.::•,:.:,,. tD 'a n ;� I � �� jQ �+ � C'( Cj: Iii�O'" E ............. osNvo 8 • � 'anv vnNsvN N o M ?:'tA :<C�> '3�V vnHSVN e- n 30 :�.: i"iCJ. ii�:?i � .y ':� ii '': � � � r :>.cv >'c�+:: :::::.�.�.. s ............ .� ::.;;::::�? � anv ynoiavw 1!1.::i� rS. it ,��' `�'' '34V NONNYI j :;. �:.: e:;:�: �'; t r>, M :i:i:i ,:;ii; a >:':':`�';;i vt-i >i�.?' C}.' .,J .� .t :: (�� < xnv3e v� '3nv xnv3e vi � f � � y..1 a3SVN--��_�li.,�� 5 I ! 1` V °i M F- � v~i ...� `\� `• a3lHVN a3lhVN N t N o M \�; �i d' m yllOyN 3�V a310vN �. C � � N o� a3lOVN � � a Z 1 .-::;G3. �(ii.2 � N ro N M� rf� >+:+.:� i�Y+?i 3nV a39lvr 2 �P6 C, ' aoewvr e 1 ar�wr N m° '3/,W r1704p � '.1'�Y t13r1V1' (U C �� C �� Qi � ^N �_ N W •� Q o ��U � ' �Osy� 0. , � . W 11�►�► a C O Rf ++ fl. N C F.. . f. • •Q a 0 c0 � � � N � � � U `U � c � o � µ- �' � c0 N ` 1= F-' O � � � � rn T T iQJ> Si�,i? i.d:i� :::.�gy :�;3;4�f 0 � • ee� �.ecr volumes show a significant increase. over the 1984 volumes. While these increases are quite substantial along certain linkages, the average annual growth rate in traffic volume is roughly 7.5 percent over the four year period. The patterns of traffic shown on this map indicates the Town's most dominant circulation routes occur at its periphery. Both Interstate Highway 94 and Highway 101 are classified as principal arterials and provide high- speed, high volume. vehicular routes between major centers and distributors and are of prime importance and a major influence upon the community. According to a Minnesota Department of Transportation representative, the State plans to upgrade that portion of Highway 101 which lies within Otsego from a two lane to a four lane expressway. Construction is expected to begin in 1994. Specific improvement is to occur upon a seven mile stretch of highway located between Elk River and Rogers. Project components include grading, resurfacing, and a new bridge over the Mississippi River. The upgrade of the highway will limit direct site and street access and reinforce it as a major transportation corridor. This will influence the pace and location of development within Otsego. The City of Albertville has also expressed a desire to construct a full interchange at the intersection of Interstate 94 and County Highway 19. While such an improvement would lie outside the Town boundaries, it would have a significant impact upon both Albertville and that portion of Highway 19 which does lie within Otsego. If an interchange is constructed, Highway 19 would likely experience a significant increase in traffic volume which, in conjunction with convenient access to I-94, would make the corridor attractive to future development. It should be noted that the Minnesota Department of Transportation has indicated that there are no plans to complete the interchange at this time. The eventual completion of the interchange may therefore require at least partial funding by the City of Albertville. b. Rail Facilities A Burlington Northern rail line bisects the southwestern corner of Otsego. The railway division of MnDOT has indicated that one northbound and one southbound train pass through the Town on a daily basis. While passenger service is not provided, freight service could be made available on selected adjacent sites. To date, this potential rail service has not been exploited as all abutting property exists as undeveloped, agriculturally used land. Potential for utilization would be quite limited, however, due to its location in the very southwest corner of the Town. c. Bus Service Commercial passenger bus service is not provided within either the Town of Otsego or the City of Albertville. Greyhound Bus Lines, however, does provide passenger service to t-he City of Elk River, which lies just north of Otsego on Highway 101. Similar to air service, the majority of Otsego bus travel needs are provided by the larger population centers which surround the Town (i.e., St. Cloud, Buffalo, Minneapolis). d. Senior Citizen Transportation Wright County Human Services provides a senior citizen transportation service on a County -wide basis. Drivers are area residents who volunteer their time and private vehicle for door to door ride service. D. LAND USE CONTROLS AND PLANNING 1. Building Permits�Code Enforcement: The Wright County Zoning and Planning Office presently hold the responsibility for the issuing of building permits, construction, inspection, and code enforcement in the community. While applications for permits are received at the Town Hall, all technical work rests with the County. The quality of service which is provided by the County Planning and Zoning Office has also been considered excellent. The problem which does -exist, however, is with the volume of activity generated by Otsego and the County's ability to respond. From the community's perspective, concerns in this regard relate primarily to property maintenance, code enforcement, and notably the prosecution of such cases by the County Attorney. Again to be emphasized is not the quality of or commitment to such matters by County Officials, but rather the volume and timing factors which slow response due to staffing levels and the size of work requirements. As a reference in this regard, during calendar year 1989, the County processed 169 permits within Otsego. The County Staff estimates that 10 to 15 percent of its permit processing time is devoted to Otsego matters and that of major code enforcement efforts, Otsego work is equal to 60 to 70 percent of the total. 29 As a result, the community has looked into its hiring of its own Building Official to complete .building permits and inspections as well as code enforcement. The required hearings have in fact been held for the local takeover of such responsibilities. No final action has, however, been taken on this matter pending a decision on municipal status. Note should also be made that this action has been undertaken in coordination with and the full cooperation of Mr. Tom Salkowski, the Director of the Wright County Planning and Zoning .Office. Moreover, preliminary discussions have taken place on the gradual and progressive transfer of such responsibilities from the County to the community should the Building Official function be assumed by Otsego. 2. Subdivision: As in the case of all major land use control functions, subdivision in Otsego rests with decisions rendered by the Wright County Board of Commissioners. Again, while County services in this regard are viewed as positive, there are noted problems. Once such issue is the extent and overlapping duplication of review. Applicants are subjected to processing through the Town Planning Commission, Town board, and County Planning Commission prior to reaching the County Board for action. This results in a time consuming process which frustrates all concerned. A related issue is that the Town does not recoup processing expenses for its duplication of requests as is the case with a majority of communities. This results in a major financial burden for Otsego. Another factor of the present County subdivision process is a lack of neighborhood focused. park facilities. Understandably, the County emphasizes regional parks. This focus, however, deprives the local community of a recreation system tailored to its population and .its program and geographic needs. Another very prime consideration is that the Wright County Subdivision Ordinance is understandably not oriented to major urbanization situations. As such, many standard municipal subdivision procedures and requirements viewed as necessary to manage growth are not imposed within the County regulations. This situation hampers the community from properly controlling the major urban development which has and continues to be experienced. Storm. water management improvements are an evident example of such inadequacies. As a means to address present shortcomings, and in hopeful preparation of municipal status, a revision and upgrading of subdivision regulations is presently in process. for Otsego. These new regulations will be broader in scope and coverage in these critical control areas and geared to urban improvements and requirements as applicable. 30 O F�— W W �' ' F-' Z W H � � f-- � Z O Q Q V LL. � O S; O C �i � � Q 3 O m O u> ti c0 cfl M l�'M 00'NIO;O � cD'O riti �tQl cal T N T T ' I(V Tlr r',M i T N f Q� I I , o� � � I'- H I I T N N r i r T� pi I I r W S F- O W M r r r T r � � I IIt� I W J f H a m F=-- � I i � (() T I I I QT ; I w I , I I ii� � � I I Z H W ' I � Z i Q H IMMrrNMNNrNr'cj''�INrir( rfTi f.O� � M I W W I � Z � I ` J t~ I I � I Q I � I � I tp O T T N tL') r N M r' (p � T IT N T 1� I N I � T I �'' I i 0 I.L. � I f � � N M r M N N M rl M �7" '� M � �3' ' O � N ' cD T I T I l[') Y ' I ' I U I � ' m � I , � � I I w T T Tro T (,fl , (� I N T I r Q: N � i � M � I W � j i, (A N T N T �I fr �r iC0 CJ iN '�'T r N O I- � � � ' I I M Z W I � f w i- I � i Z � W H J\ I i i I H Z ! W i— I ! I Y! W I W Wf � :� W W IJ ,Q W I iOUO� W �— ZJQJ'HjJ �� DI � O� Q Q H J 'H I� �w H O Z I Q Z -� Q 3 0 z J S > w'U,O'O IH �'cA S� Q' Z O Q S� I- iZ Y U W I(n I -I Ip lL W 'S Y O J I J H u_ F— Q Q IH !� Z Z J �} �p 'j- �W Y � I-- U'F— OI Q a. m u_ Q w Y Q w a� ;o .z �cn U J �� o U o! i- 3 J= S J O � Q 'Q ;H O iF- O f-+ O !- H O f O t- Q m U U U IO IfY Ulu-illi�'�i��g10 � cn c� tnf> 3� F- � 31 T 0 W �--� Cn W WN I.L Z O H (!� � H I- � Z � � O O U U U Z ' = H � Z z � ¢ 3 J d Nln tnr.-�tn�t'd'd'NM *-�-MtnNOr M J � T T Q F" W f"' �-- H T N r' T T T CO 'U'^ v! H '- N r r r r (� W F- U � O m W M M O �' w d r r r r N N r r � a¢ � J U d r N M r CJ +- M M to to CO W N Z O N W ♦- M r N N � O W' Z W Q F- J J Q r N r r- N N r O W *- a �o U Z Q J r r N +- N r I N *- T � T '^ � m ^ WU � U O O i I Y� W W W ' OJ W Q Y J J OCIW � w I-- Z J Q J H J O U �� J � � O� Q Q H J H> W � H O Z � Q ZJQ30ZJS > W 000�lnSCCQ Z O Q=� E-' Z `1 U W (n J H C7 !1 W= `1 O J J H LL. �-- Q Q H Z Z J �-- � F- W `t > �-- U I- � Q ri mwQwY�Qwa�ozv�UJ�oUo �-- � amp ioo��o� n�c~n>� � 32 3. Zoning: a. General Zoning administration and controls in Otsego parallel the subdivision process in terms of procedures and responsibilities as outlined above. The case work involving Otsego zoning matters completed by Wright County in 1989 is illustrated on the following two tables. These show that a large share of such activity on the part of the County is required for Otsego. The duplication in processing requirements where the Town provides a first review of zoning requests with subsequent consideration by the County Planning Commission and Board is a time consuming and costly process not relating to an area of relatively rapid urbanisation and development. Also due to authority resting with the County, the Town's work and expenses involved in these matters goes on without compensation. This is a significant financial problem for the Town. Finally, while recognizing that the County is highly responsive to the needs and interests of the Town, there is an evident lack of self-determination and control which does pose problems if difficulties are experienced with resulting development. b. District Application: The map on the following page illustrates the current zoning in Otsego. This is followed by a table providing a breakdown of these classifications. The balance of the text in this section provides a description of each district, its purpose, and its utilization in Otsego. (1) Rural�Agricultural Districts o A-G Zoning District. The A-G, General Agriculture Districts were established for the purpose of preserving, promoting, maintaining and enhancing the use of land use. for commercial agricultural purposes, to prevent scattered and leap frog non- farm growth and to protect and preserve natural resource areas. This is the predominant zoning district applied in Otsego. o A-R Zoning District. This District is created to serve as a buffer between commercial agricultural areas and more intensely developed residential areas, to provide for very low density residential development in areas especially unsuited to long term agricultural uses, and to allow limited residential development which will not be provided 33 �� 1. N !- ',` C� _ yq� U f] ® � n W � Y�� Y� in � -� �W �� , U O Z � W � � � � � �°�i; 1—' 4 N � i � --' �... � N a�� SON�1N o o� ® v - • ��a r7 P. � N <� j- � t � � /" � ./ � � l '� / •�. v vnHsvN • / 1 'r N cc\ c I� � � �� a i � o0 !II' ' it •--' ._ ii ✓t � I O� .— `' �' II � c t 1 �' m `�,,' �� { �' HVN a3lhVN /� m ;; � a370VN C.l I- r �T o c v c � x m m \,' r � aoewvr a307vr 'jAV Nj1)VI' nv xvavn0 H N N < `t USN o M ?:1 3�V OaVNOVd ao. .:••� N NV300 •• ;Mc.. M �,' NI car<� �u� i� :� �� r N cO CA � N M N � r7 '3n ,�:' nHSVN F o ut 5 �) n YOY� N � •Bnv a�sn7vow '3�V NOSVw � � r� � r) I � 5 rn � ;� �anv 3v,o7avw •anv aan{ ovw �- ,,��5 . . �ly� � )• N m fi ra (��\• � • �• , VI N O �•• .i I` _ _ v XnV38 vl N � N N w t 0 '3nV XhV30 Vl N '^ � M o n •anv a37ovN r r N •3nv aao7vr env a�r�vr a37avN y � M � 7 � ��. e �� ., t � r{ . z CS � �' � �O � r � � N � � O 0 m "� N V � oa. �� p„ a d 0 O T N c 0 o - N t � � � 3 � � .. 'O ` O C ',. C N p •� .0 y � � � Q U O C ` •� O y N C � � � N p .p. Cn '. N � � U � p N � N m n. �+ 'C N �' m d �, N �U .� p T! C N N v (7 to o°C � .- N 3 p m N � C ,, r O ®� 0 C _ O N � M1) � w f+ � a C C N � N '� 'O N U h` �� c '� in ro � oC m Q � c � � b � T ro a a �+ M L c a s ,n rn C7. � to //1 = Q D: � N 0] �tv3�, 34 with an urban level of services. Density for the A-R District is limited to one dwelling unit per 10 acres. The A-R Zoning District is a newly established district and was adopted into the Wright County Zoning Ordinance in 1989. There are currently very few A-R zoned properties in Wright County; none of which are located in Otsego at this time. As illustrated on the existing zoning map, the majority of land in Otsego is zoned A-G, General Agriculture. The Wright County Planning Department has stated that parcels currently zoned A-G and abutting residential areas have the potential to be rezoned to A-R, Agricultural Residential District in the near future. (2) Residential Districts: o R-1, Urban�Rural Transitional District. This District is established in areas within the Town for the purpose of allowing limited urban growth. The major purpose of this District is to provide areas within the Town where urban development can take place and where urban services can be readily extended and provided. This District will be located immediately adjacent to '`cities with existing sanitary sewer services. Project densities for the R-1 District are limited to a maximum of one (1) dwelling unit per acre. Otsego's R-1 zoning districts are primarily located in the northeast corner of the Town, with additional R-1 districts located along Highway 101 and River Road and in the northwest corner of the Town. Smaller R-1 districts are located near LaBeaux Avenue and 80th Street, 70th Street and MacIver Avenue, and 67th and Oakwood Avenue. o R-2, Suburban Residential District. The major purpose of this District is to allow for a "rural lifestyle" by permitting low density residential development in areas that are marginal or non - feasible for agriculture. Project densities for the R-2 District are limited to a maximum of one (1) dwelling unit per two and one-half (2-1�2) acres. Otsego's R-2 districts are primarily located in the northeast corner of the Town, along 70th Street near River Road, near Jason Avenue and 65th Street and near 95th Street and Jambor Avenue. 35 o R-2A, Suburban Residential District. The major purpose of this District is to allow for a "rural lifestyle" by permitting low density residential development in areas that are marginal or non - feasible for agriculture. Project densities for the R-2A District are limited to a maximum of one (1) dwelling unit per five (5) acres. Otsego's R- 2A districts are located in the southwest corner of the. Town on the corner of Pa,card Avenue and 70th Street and on Nashua Avenue near 85th Street. o R-3, Multiple. Family Urban District. An R-3 District is established to allow multiple family dwellings in areas that are provided with community water and sewer systems or systems approved by the Pollution Control Agency, the County Sanitarian and substantiated by specific engineering data.' There are currently no R-3, Multiple Family Urban Districts located in Otsego. (3) Commercial Districts o B-1, Highway Business District. A B-1 District is established to accommodate those types of businesses that require an accessibility to highways to successfully function. To minimize unmanageable strip development, B-1 Districts should only allow the type of businesses that absolutely require highway accessibility. Otsego's B-1 districts are located on the south side of 90th Street near the intersection of Highway 101. o B-2, General Business District. The General Business District is intended to provide a district that will allow general retail and commercial uses to serve existing population. Otsego's B-2 districts are located at the intersection of Highway 101 and River Road. (4) Industrial Districts o I-1, Limited Industry District. The intent of the I-1, Limited Industry District is to provide a district that will: (1) allow general industrial development related to the existing development in the urban communities of the County, (2) encourage development that is compatible with surrounding or abutting districts, and (3) provide developmental standards that will not impair the traffic -carrying capabilities of abutting roads and highways. There currently are no I-1 zoning districts located in Otsego. 36 OTSEGO (WRIGHT COUNTY), MINNESOTA 1989 ZONING BREAKDOWN '" Zoning District Percent Zoning Percent District Classification Acreage Of Total Types Acr, eage Of Total A-G Gen Agricultural A-R Residential Agricultural (min. 10 acres) 16,298 87.3 Agriculture 16,298 87.3 R-1 Urban�Rural Transition (min. 1 acre) 1,756 9.4 R-2 Suburban Residential (min 2.5 acre) 465 � 2.5 Residential 2,318 12.4 R-2A Suburban Residential (min 5.0 acre) 97 0.5 R-3 Multi Family Urban -- -- Residential -- -- B-1 Highway Business 35 0.2 B-2 General .Business 15 0.1 Business 50 0.3 I-1 Limited Industry -- -- Industrial -- -- '` TOTALS 18,666* 100.0 18,666* 100.0 FP Floodplain -- -- -- -- S-1 Special Protection Shorelands 155* 0.8 Overlay S-2 Residential Districts 492 2.6 Recreation Shorelands 337* 1.8 S-3 Commercia l Recreational Shorelands -- -- Overlay -- -- PD Planned Development Districts (Min. 10 acres) -- -- -- -- W Wild and Scenic Overlay River -- -- Districts -- -- *Overlay and Floating Districts not included in total acreage. NOTE: River acreage not zoned, therefore not included in total acreage. SOURCE: Wright County Planning Department, 1989 37 (5) Overlay�Floating Districts o FP, Floodplain District. The Floodplain District is created for the purpose of protecting the public health and safety and to minimize property damage and pollution from flood water. Boundaries for the Floodplain Districts are outlined on the Federal -Flood Insurance Maps. The standards contained in the Floodplain District have been incorporated from the model floodplain ordinance developed by the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) in conformance with the Floodplain Zoning Act. o Shoreland Districts. The major purpose �of the Shoreland Districts is to control the density and location. of developments in the shorelands of the public waters of the County in order to preserve the water quality and the natural characteristics of the shorelands and public waters. These districts conform to the standards and requirements of the .State Shoreland Management Act. The regulations in the Shoreland Zoning District of Wright County apply to all rivers and lakes classified as either Natural Environment (NE), Recreational Development (RD), or General Development (GD) by the Department of Natural Resources. In July 1989, the State Department of Natural Resources adopted new Shoreland regulations with expanded coverage for areas bordering primary rivers. Once more information is available on these new standards, analysis will be required to determine their impact upon the Mississippi and Crow River areas in the community. o S-1, Special Protection Shorelands District. The intent of the S-1, Special Protection Shorelands District is to guide .the wise development and utilization of shorelands of public waters for the preservation of water quality and natural characteristics of all public waters in the unincorporated areas of the County and to manage areas unsuitable for development due to wet soils, steep slopes, or larger areas of exposed bedrock; and to manage areas of unique natural and biological characteristics in accordance with compatible uses. Otsego has one S-1, Special Protection Shoreland Overlay District located in an around Rice Lake. o S-2, Residential -Recreational Shorelands District. The intent of the S-2, Residential -Recreational Shorelands District is to preserve areas which have natural characteristics suitable for both passive and active recreational usage and to manage areas suitable for residential development of varying types including permanent and seasonal housing. Otsego has two S-2, Residential Recreational Shoreland Overlay Districts. One is located in and around Mud Lake near Albertville and the other is located in and around the wetland located next to Odell Avenue. o S-3, Commercial -Residential Shorelands District. The intent of the 5-3, Commercial -Residential Shorelands District �is to provide suitable locations for, and to encourage the development of, commercial recreation facilities in those areas of the County which benefit the recreational needs of both residents and tourists and restrict incompatible commercial and industrial uses. Otsego currently has no S-3, Shoreland Zoning Overlay Districts within its boundaries. o W, Wild and Scenic River District. The purpose of this district is to protect and preserve. the scenic, recreational, natural and historical values of the Mississippi River in Wright County by carefully controlling development of this river corridor consistent with the State Wild and Scenic River Act and Minnesota Regulations NR 78-81. As illustrated on the existing zoning district map, Otsego's Wild and Scenic River District is located along the edge of the Mississippi River. o PD, Planned Unit Development. This District establishes provisions for the granting of a conditional use permit to provide for a Planned Unit Development project. The purpose of the Planned Unit Development is to encourage a flexibility in the design and development of land in order to promote its appropriate use; to facilitate the adequate and economical provisions of streets and utilities, and to preserve the natural and scenic qualities for open areas. A Planned Unit Development shall be as defined as any project utilizing ten (10) or more acres of contiguous land. Otsego currently has no PD, Planned Unit Development Districts within its boundaries. 39 c. Zoning Ordinance Text: Characteristic of a majority of Wright County regulations, the Zoning Ordinance which governs Otsego is non -urban oriented. As such, there is insufficient coverage of items which are viewed as critical to the community for governing growth management. The need therefore to expand upon the base established by the County regulations is primary if existing problems are to be corrected and future problems avoided. d. Zoning Ordinance Update: The Town has recognized for some .time the problems and difficulties which exist with the current zoning regulations and as a consequence, commissioned an update of these development controls in 1989. .The new regulations by necessity will build upon the existing regulations and notably the districts which are part of the County Ordinance and which are currently applied in Otsego. This pertains to the standard use districts and also the special DNR mandated zones. The text will, however, expand greatly on the districts and performance standards in order to provide more control in governing development. This process has also involved preliminary discussions with the Wright County Planning Office on the transition of activities in an orderly fashion from the County to the community. It is anticipated that .the County would continue to administer such controls through a contractual arrangement until the community is organized and staffed to assume control. Note should also be made that the DNR has expressed concern that its areas of special controls are not overlooked (see letter-. Exhibit C). Besides the foregoing factors which address the DNR interests, Otsego's contact with the agency for grant funds documents the conununity's recognition of its responsibilities in these zoning matters. A letter regarding grants and environmental controls from the community which predates the DNR correspondence is also contained in Exhibit C. A final example documenting Otsego's recognition of zoning responsibilities and DNR concerns can be found in the Planning Tactics report dated April 1989. 4. Land Use Plan: A major advantage afforded Otsego is the progressive land use planning efforts which have been historically undertaken by Wright County. There has been a long standing recognition on the part of the County to plan and maintain compatible and harmonious land use relationships and as a result, such direction has been formally established. A copy of the current Wright County Land Use Plan is provided on the following page. This map approach to land use planning is the primary element of the County document. While this technique is appropriate and adequate for the vast majority of rural townships within Wright County, it is not sufficiently detailed nor broad enough in scope and coverage to properly address and manage the type, scale, and extent of development within Otsego. Given the existing and projected intensity of .development plus problems which confront Otsego, a much broader, truly Comprehensive Plan is required. Recognizing this need, the Town Board has already taken action to commission a plan update. This process was started in early 1989 with the undertaking of a Planning Tactics Study (April 1989). This effort involved, problem and issue identification and the organization of a program or "strategic" plan whereby these matters could be addressed. Subsequently, a completed Comprehensive Plan update was authorized. The background data assembly of this program was completed in February 1990 with the production of the Otsego Township Comprehensive Plan Inventory. A draft Policy Plan has also been reviewed by the Otsego Planning Commission in May 1990, and work is now proceeding on the Development Framework portion of the plan. By way of reference as to plan content and as a means to compare the existing Wright County Plan to the Town Plan which is .now being completed, the following outline is a listing of topics and organization of the Otsego Plan which is currently being formulated. I. Issue Summary and Analysis A. Natural Environmental Issues 1. Ground Water Pollution 2. Agricultural Land Protection 3. River Corridors�Floodplains 4. Drainageways and Wetland�Ponding Areas 5. Vegetation 6. Erosion 7. Air and Noise Pollution B. Land Use Issues 1. Agricultural Preservation 2. Residential Development 3. Commercial Development 4. Industrial Development C. Transportation Issues 1. Classification�Network 2. Highway 101 3. Construction and Upgrade 4. Specialized Services�Needs 41 5 Y b a00Yaa SONrtllvH wneHtva ONINNVN t Hd100NYa ONnISwvN a31wvN �131 NtYN oaoeava 3"13tgva AONInb A310IfW 3oaN3nb sN33nb lsvnb wvnb 3i73at NvnO J �vnb n AYovnb LL_ Nosavd Hslaavd NOlANINaYd NNYd r W i17aYd N3a0YftYd /� 3oYd �/ J 113DOYd ONYNJvd ONY1N0 N3H00 N3t1')0 T3n0 trv3o0 AY0,0 WY91gb 2 NVIa9 ,0 OOOMNYO N Navl'ff3N wvNb33N u a01NOnvt7 ' NOSVN vrolsvll a31dYH N310YN � Y1Y0`/N U N3ttYN H z Nn n3n T � a3lslriv�w __L_ N31vw 0. NfT.aAvn NOSVw zv TVHSavn z �noiavn 3 p 317.N3NJvn ~' a3ngYw vIIVSYI 336varl O NONttvl 30av1 a30t7Y1 1 NOwn 1a373wv1 NYrlVgvl O xnv3e vi 3trvN ONYIIYN VON3lVN a35tYN W a3i17vN ilnN NvOVV ON103vN N 310YN L N3SItvr 1�� ll3tnr 33aNvr NOSIwYr 53Y(Yr a09MYr • a3oiYr NosxJvr a3evr Y a 0 0 5 5 � 5 � m o f` � J Q � � z O W J _� (/) L>_1 W C.� J J J � L� --� --� _1 Q � � W W W U_ U_ � p � � (n (/� � C� C� W W O Q Q � � U • �.;�, i=� � u•.i� IaL II. D. Community Facilities/Services 1. Public Sanitary Sewer Collection/Treatment 2. Public Water 3. Parks/Trails 4. Town Hall/Community Center E. Development Administration 1. Urban Status 2. Community Planning/Zoning 3. -Building Inspection/Code Enforcement Policy Plan A. Community Goals B. Natural Environmental Goals C. Natural Environmental Polices D. Land Use Goals E. Land Use Policies F. Transportation Goals G. Transportation Policies H. Community Goals I. Community Policies J. Administration Goals K. Administration Policies Development Framework A. Concept Plan 1. Community Identity 2. Community Focus 3. Land Use Transition 4. Environmental Protection 5. Functional Classification 6. General Concept B. Natural Environment Plan 1. Topography 2. Soils 3. River Corridor/Floodplain 4. Wetlands/Ponding Areas of Roadways C. Land Use Plan 1. Basis of Community Plan 2. Projected Growth 3. Land Use Plan Elements a. General Land Use Plan b. Rural Uses c. Residential Uses d. Commercial Uses e. Industrial Uses f. Development Regulations g. Annexation/Detachment h. Zoning :�? E. D. Transportation Plan 1. Streets and Highways 2. Railroads 3. Pedestrian and Bicycle Trails 4. Bus Service 5. Senior Citizen Transportation E. Community Facilities Plan 1. Public Utilities 2. Parks and Recreation 3. Governmental Buildings and. Facilities F. Planning Districts (Geographic Plans - Nine Subareas) The need for the updated plan becomes continually more evident with the passage of time and the continuing volume of development requests being confronted. Finalization of the Comprehensive Plan update is projected for late Fall 1990. GOVERNMENTAL SERVICES 1. Water and Sanitary Sewer System: Otsego is currently without public sanitary sewer and water facilities. The sewer and water needs of the area are currently provided by individual on -site sewer systems and individual wells. There is, however, one "consolidated" semi-public private sewer system located in Otsego. The system is part of the River Bend Mobile Home Park near Highway 101 and River Road. The sewage treatment facility is maintained by the park owner although Otsego has some joint legally assigned responsibilities for the systems operation. Land use potential, in terms of the water and sanitary sewer systems needed for development, are controlled through the functions of the Wright County Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. Potential lot size must be sufficient enough to .permit installation of individual sewage disposal systems. in accordance with all requirements of Section 716, Sewage Disposal Standards, of the Wright County Zoning Ordinance. Percolation tests, soil tests, and test borings are required for approval by the Wright County Inspection Department prior to the issuance of building permits. Ground water contamination and pollution issues have currently become serious enough issues in Otsego to require immediate attention to establish a public facilities plan. In this regard, discussions and meetings have taken place between Otsego and Elk River officials as a basis for exploring at least interim, temporary measures to address sewage treatment possibilities. Work on a sewage collection system is also being considered, although authorization has not as yet been granted. Finally, as a preventative measure, Otsego will likely pursue upgraded on -site sewer maintenance measures in the near future. This aspect of operations will, however, rest on the change in level status and the hiring of a Building Official by the local community. 2. Police Protection: The Town of Otsego currently contracts with the Wright County Sheriff's Department for police protection and enforcement. One patrolman is assigned to Otsego on a daily basis with an additional patrolman dispatched to Otsego, Albertville and 5t. Michael on a surveillance route completed three times daily. The Township currently pays the County for such service on a contrac t basis f.or, $42,639.96 annually (1990). 3. Fire Protection: The Town of Otsego contracts with both the Albertville Volunteer Fire Department and the Elk River Volunteer Fire Department. Properties to the west of Nashua Avenue are serviced by the Albertville Volunteer Fire Department, while properties to the east of Nashua Avenue are serviced by the Elk River Fire Department. This division of jurisdiction geographically divides the community into two equal halves. The Township currently pays the City of Elk River an annual total of $36,961.78 and the. City of Albertville an annual total of $20,000.00 Thus, total contracted fire service costs for the Township result in $56,931.78 annually. The fire rating of the community is presently Class 6 and 9. This level of classification is not expected to increase as no substantial upgrade in service is envisioned. 4. Public Works: The major traffic carrier in the community is TH 101 which is under the jurisdiction and maintenance of the Minnesota Department of Transportation. The Town has, however, contributed to and participated financially in safety improvements to the facility through the installation of traffic signals at the intersection with CSAH 39. The cost to the Town was $16,682.00. Other major streets and roads Wright County facilities and maintenance responsibility of miles of County highways total within t11e Town are primarily are not the repair or the local community. The 31.5. 45 Local streets, totalling some 58.3 miles, are however the jurisdiction of the Town. The repair and maintenance of these facilities is handled by the Maintenance Supervisor, who is supported on a regular basis by two employees. The major equipment inventory of the Town for street purposes is comprised of two snow plows (trucks), two pick-up trucks, a tractor (mower), a compactor, and a wheat sprayer. 5. Administration: The Town of Otsego is staffed by a part-time clerk who is presently elected to office. Financial responsibilities _ rest with a Town Treasurer, who also serves in a part-time capacity- and is appointed to the position. These individuals are supplemented by two full-time positions which are titled Assistant Town Clerk and Secretary. The job descriptions of these individuals are contained in the appendix exhibits of this report. Note should also be made that the Town Board Supervisors take a direct hands-on approach in the community's administration and are highly active in continuing and 'day-to-day administrative matters and problem resolution. Technical administrative services are obtained by the Town on a contract basis. The Radzwill Law Office serves as legal counsel. The firm of Hakanson, Anderson and .Associates, Inc. serves as the Town Engineer, and planning services. are provided Northwest Associated Consultants., Inc. Building permits, zoning subdivision application processing, and code enforcement are functions performed by the Wright County Zoning and Planning Office with the assistance of Town administrative personnel. Finally, animal control is contracted. 6. Library Service: Library services to Otsego residents are available through Wright County operations. The closest facilities are located in the Cities of St. Michael, Elk River, Monticello, and Rogers. Bookmobile service previously existed to the community, but at present has been terminated. 7. Parks: The Otsego County Park and Recreational Facility is currently the only park within the Town. As illustrated on the following Community Facilities Map, Otsego County Park covers roughly 30 acres and is located off of Great River Road (CSAH 39), one mile south of Elk River. The Park is adjacent to the Mississippi River and includes such amenities as picnic areas with shelters, limestone trails, a play field, a tot lot, toilets, and canoe access. Park amenities are provided with no entrance fees. Recently, the Park has also been extensively involved with a prairie restoration project. Otsego County Park has been slated for expansion over the next three years and is anticipated to be '- �� -, Z °� a %i >- :� N �' Q U v N � �� yLL of n J � in �W �� IN�� O '�' 99m � ��" QUO v _ O Z d LLl � � � � � � � i�r� v to � � soNlvnva r�r5 N a.. o � � P`� . � '�`�'/ L � / '- N +° N �I%F+I ---.. - �r N � M � 5 _ .. n � �U� 0 ..r ' � 31Vnb _. -�- _ ,..•� nv wovno � ( "^' a �, � r � W +, } �,,,.. LL W � c z� �� ,.,. JQa oa � :�' � �aQ �� (, i"� � �L� �"` N � NV300 � ii 1 i,� ..� (D n ,� ((�` .no F i ¢ EC ))t v� / �` � � �� r9 � � a ,� Cis Q � N� N M Z = N r t7 N� '3AV VnHSVN 3AV VnHSVN o O 5 � L� ~ � � L�Y1' i � � o �ci ? � � '3nV a31SIllVOry � 'I � I') N M vi O 00 � c r � � n o �anv a++o�avW '° w '3nv a3nl �vry __ ..._ '+� '3nV NONNVI 3N � 1 ��'�"` � i �� s � � �_UnIV� Nt � �d' � � � rp vi I� II N ro N t N�,\�, ..,� f I y � � O^ ` �` � \\ 1V t !� N �� J % /� ryZj �.. O1 r /�'�'' y.., -- xnvaa n 'anv xnv3a vi �1.�I ,� � m � r � � `J \' � tl3'IHV11 H3lNVN N L N L M \,JI)� o � � n-.Lv�.l'lti\rS. $ m ' m a3lOVN '3nV a3lOVN C rc� � L .- r a3lOVN J � S O Y O+ e N N Iaoervvr '�v a3��vr 2'` ��5° u� '\ a3oivr 0J "' 'Inv ill9�f ':lnV a1aV1' n /1 7 C = .� d r.. �� '(j 0 m s�U . � o"Q a 1 � w L�� 2 a a� rn T n :� ---y C td a+ 7 N C O U -o ++ fQ .� O N Q ++ N d .� ' z ai V y � � V1 p � � N- :v � � �U LL � 't7 tt. � � y C �. N d W completed in 1993. As illustrated on the next map, expansion plans include the acquisition of 55 additional acres to the west of the existing Park. The estimated $134,000 expansion plan will include the extension of the existing trail system, and the Park's prairie restoration project. Otsego County Park is well located with respect to the population it serves, however, future demand for public open space will increase as development takes place. An evaluation of additional park .facilities dispersed throughout the developing areas can be identified as an - � issue to address during the comprehensive -planning process. Additional notable elements of Otsego's public recreational open space facilities are the wildlife management areas located around Rice Lake and near 67th Street and Odell. •These areas are currently owned by the State of Minnesota and are managed by the Department of Natural Resources. 8. Governmental Buildings: The. community presently has only two structures devoted to local governmental activities. Otsego's existing administrative facilities are located north of County Road 39 (95th Street) and east of Nashua Avenue and lie upon the original Town site. As the "nerve center" of community government, the Town Hall houses all town administrative and meeting functions. The Town Hall site, which measures 3.2 acres in size, also accommodates the public works facilities of the Town. The property is zoned R-2 and is also located_ within the Wild and Scenic designation applied to the Mississippi River which lies some 450 feet to the north. The existing facility has been judged as totally inadequate and substandard for existing and projected operations. Through the Town meeting held in March of 1990, directives were given by the community residents. to pursue a new structure. The design plans for a new structure have been tentatively approved in August 1990 for bidding by the project Building Committee. A matter of continuing discussion, however, is the location of. the new administrative center. The other Town structure devoted to public use is the maintenance building, which is located on the same site as the Town Hall. A recent expansion to this building is expected to meet space needs for the immediate future. On the long term, however, the location of the public works facility on this site has been questioned due to the existing and projected residential character of the area. In conjunction with a new Town Hall building and possible new site, an investigation is currently underway to make a determination of a possible new site for the public works activity. �; Z �, Q � � w �U U w Q 0 w a 0 0 0 0 �r 0 U . C .� d C .O.R! �� N�� •V O 30 o i �U w oQ a w a o. O rn rn r a m rn c .� c a �, w c 0 � U .. +• � t � rn c •� � � 0 m .�c � so � a o rn � c '«- N_ X W Y L /0 �� V X 1 • Besides the two existing buildings and their possible relocation, the community is undertaking a study which analyzes all possible community service building needs and their appropriate locations in the community. The Community Facilities Study, completed in August 1990, is currently under review by the Building Committee and following acceptance by this- body, is expected to be further considered at an -informal: Town meeting in late September of early October 1990. Also of note is the Elk __ Otsego for a new "middle" Preliminary discussions community have taken .place representatives. 9.' Recycling: Otsego currently sponsors program itself processes including aluminum, tin, promoted large community designated specific days recyclable bulk materials collected. PROBLEMS River School District's focus on or "transitional." school facility. of a possible location in the between the District and the Town its own recycling program. The nearly all recyclable materials glass, etc.. The Town has also scale clean-up efforts and has of the year in which certain such as tires and batteries may 1. Pollution�Environmental Problems and Needed Services: a. Ground Water Pollution: A paramount concern is pollution due to possible failure. According to possibility of such an situation due to soil Additionally, the very which has been experie advantages, also intensif problem and makes the plus costly. In a very pr Township Officials and possible means to start a disposal issue. On discussions have been held concerning the potential treatment facilities. Whi the threat of ground water wide spread septic system the Township Engineer, the occurrence is a realistic ;onditions and water tables. evident development density Iced, while offering some Les the potential pollution pollution threat wide spread igressive and positive move, staff have begun to explore idressing the sanitary waste an initial basis, formal with the City of Elk River �f utilizing the City's waste Le the feasibility of such an arrangement is far from completion, the pursuit of this possible option is a highly positive step in a mandated direction. Beyond simply the treatment facility issue is the need to define the possible placement of trunk 50 Z � �' N � � �� w W � J � � am �� V o ? �w ��,� ��W -� W � � �3� I- a N � � _ aN N .• S �o � � �, z 0 U � W � ' ir��s� �•: _— 00 J d - � LL J .. r W � � m�.`Ovno iif>•. v (n , �•. V o J '. ••�••q�,, •.••� Q .•h• ••• J Z 4 'li r• o� W � �•v'Jn�a �3':'a•�j. �vN Z � W �, F ` a f �P � 1 �,` c � J w •� '^ I3nv Nosvw Q � i C}' � ao � ,.....i 5 � � Z � anv ynoia a ~ � "� •, Z 1 "� ' a' N o ;+ ' � j i � <; F... � r,, � . °' � �•,;. , xnvae n a�JY.__��ll I < �, ou ,- tL � n U f] ,.. �., cv �' r ; 1' .,� '~^ N s I r7 n '3nv a�smvow �. M � � ,�� vry a3ni ovw / '3�V N NV'1 3 , s �� t m `N � �,.. � � � •3nv xnv3 vi k �� s � �.� M .,�i in �u •, � � I \ '� \ i' ' a3lOVN � � � o c v N m � \ \ � 2 N i:�) \ N w 1 N M e ��,, r �v aao�vr �h°� a00� �'� .� � r � � 0J a30lYr � � '3nV aJBVr 'env aaevr i� N 0 Z Q J W O ,x,^ V/• W a z W J ka.. Z w z O z W 0 Z Q J H W k= 'U = C .� � C �� y�N ��V O♦ o � �v W oa a 'Z w 1_ a_ to �� CW7 Q a 0 Q a a`� z n o a a d +- N O W �' W O .p C/) °' '`w' C Y ♦ C J ;, a Z `° 3 W "� a C Z U py�� N W 0- �®� (� / � Z y W 51 facilities for optimum service capability and lateral extension, the system funding methods, and the formulation of subdivision development policies and regulations necessary for a future public system installation and operation. Moreover, interim measures directed at septic system maintenance and monitoring are necessary to forestall. a premature pollution crisis. The point in this regard is that the issue of a sanitary waste system is complex and far reaching, involving many diverse elements which must be coordinated and focused. As was noted previously, this is viewed as the highest priority concern of the __ ___.community due to the threat to public health and safety which is seen to exist. The response to this problem is viewed as beyond Wright, County which presently retains development and regulatory authority. b. Agricultural Preservation/Protection: While acknowledging that residential .development and urban growth is the primary target of concern, a basic premise of future efforts by the Town has been stressed as agricultura l preservation and protection. This use which constitutes approximately seventy-five percent of the community is viewed as a fundamental land use which is not to be unduly infringed upon or threatened. This includes both large, as well as small scale, non- agricultural uses. Relative to large scale residential development, a need is seen to :define an urban rural borderline which will serve to focus non-agricultural development in areas of existing concentrations and�or areas of marginal agricultural soils. Additionally, scattered "hobby farm" development in the rural sections of the Township has been termed a waste of valuable resources if it occurs on prime agricultural land. Moreover, the scattered development of individual residences has also been raised as a problem and has been suggested as a future situation to be generally discouraged. Beyond the basic concern to preserve this natural resource is the need to limit and conserve public service costs and needs. Defining a rural urban service area and preserving prime agricultural areas is seen as critical in this regard. Recent studies and .documentation by the Twin Cities Metropolitan Council further attest to this situation. To ensure that these objectives are achieved, completion of the Otsego Comprehensive Plan update and sophisticated zoning and subdivision regulations are mandated. The scale and scope of required attention is seen as only realistically being achieved at the community level. 52 c. Storm Drainage: A highly common situation resulting in the transition of an,area from rural to urban is storm water drainage . problems. As ,natural drainage flows are disputed, unanticipated problems are found to occur. Major problems with storm runoff have been experienced by Otsego. While these major problems have at least partially been responded to,." -concern exists over - .continuing and growing problems. The majority of the problems have resulted -from improper subdivision design and lack .of attention to grading and drainage planning. The authority for initial attention to such matters has in the past and .presently rests with Wright County. Moreover, beyond addressing storm water ;, management on a case by case basis through the subdivision process, a comprehensive storm drainage plan is required as. a means to relate individual developments and combine each area into a comprehensive system. The County, primarily for financial reasons, has been unable to respond to such engineering concerns as part of subdivision review and also on an area wide basis. Furthermore, as major problems have been confronted, the Town has been left '� primarily to itself to resolve such matters. Such a situation violates the basic principal of tying authority with responsibility. In the past, correction of the major Hall's Addition storm drainage problem. resulted in an improvement costing $450,000. Of this total, only $17,000 was assisted by non -local MnDNR funding with the balance left to the Town and affected property owners. This situation also resulted in.a highly controversial and bitterly contested improvement which was and is a major financial burden to all concerned. The extent of the storm drainage problems, ' however, continue to expand. This year, major water problems have been experienced in the 85th and Needham area. Due to County assistance not being available, the Town has looked into resolving the situation. The cost estimate for this undertaking is approximately $70,000. This burden will have to be assumed locally as the State has declined help. 2. Other Urban Problems and Needs: a. Housing and Environmental Blight: Otsego is experiencing problems characteristic of urban areas in that a relatively significant amount of housing and related environmental blight is found in the community. Such situations are concentrated in the early mobile home subdivision plus more sporadically throughout the community. The magnitude of these situations is compounded by the density of development 53 pa Z ��Z W p a p O J W wW �� ao W Z �CC G �"" (� ..- � '} w j; a O ,";' / 7'....J a �- Q )l _ ! ('� �,j J u m Ct � F- , W !;� 0 «, ' w �w` � fn' � �- 2 W `O' i F— Z W � "" U � � 'i a � a i �� I �� Z /� V t 5 m 8 Z �� N' I I �) J� 6�"� J = � S � 5 U O ��, 3 �� ' � +�� •�' W /A W v� h /W � O L 1i `\ Y ^ � 0. \,, O m ajIOVN �� o i5 �.�: N � •C V f� �� w � ff �� ' G, J W °�w.. � � `� c�� C� W Q W �� 3 3 cn Q w 1 �. �.% V N ' . � � J W soNilvva to W Z i Q Q 2-V�O M • a 4 a U - �,�- o- � �� j a' J -- � a a vnHsvN '3AV NOSVW °� G °� � ��,v �olavry d' N xnv3e vl N N N � N m r m �V AVOVnO Z 1�• w �3hV NOSavd � J N (j)j ' M W � J �. . m (A � Q •yv oavxwa �,�' ° a' Q N � Nv3oo Y M �� n 'anv a�snlvow O M •3nv a3ni ovw '3/�V NONNVI ' N. 'anv xnv3e n /� N � N) •3nv a3lovN L.� N •3nv a3olvr N .ir,v a3avr •�xro r�f4 lJ1 ,:, <i •L N {� r i0 I— Z W a O J w W � N, Q w � � �a 0 J W Q Q J �"" U U C�7 oa U Z W^ .��/\ ''�^I V/ V Z Q N N O CL a c0 3 O Il. O 'II I m c d � IC 'C C Q I7 a U il. N f Q I .0 H I i and the resulting influence on adjacent properties and their values. The April 1989 Otsego Planning Tactics Study documented this situation in general terms with the Otsego Comprehensive Planning Inventory providing site specific details. The urban blight which exists is seen as mandating a local response if it is to be resolved. As already noted, the Wright County Planning and Zoning Office has noted that 60 to 70 percent of - its, code enforcement activities are focused upon Otsego. While this time and commitment is welcomed by the community, the level is not seen as producing required results. It is expected therefore that local efforts will be necessary to achieve the progress and results which are required. b. Tax Base: As will be discussed in the subsequent section dealing with taxes, Otsego lacks investments in commercial and industrial uses which serve to spread the service burden and reduce homeowner liabilities. It is fully recognized, however, that there are numerous aspects and components to this situation,. not the least of which is public sanitary sewer service. To a significant degree, this is a "chicken and egg" situation. The community, however, needs to focus attention on major economic development opportunities which are being presented through TH 101 improvements. To meaningfully address these opportunities requires local growth management control in total. c. Land Use Harmony�Allocations: Due to past growth being primarily residential in nature, the conflict between differing uses has not been substantial in Otsego. This past situation has, however, disrupted agricultural activities which is not to be under -emphasized. It is expected, however, .that with continued growth and the resulting markets being created for non-residential, non-agricultural uses that land use compatibility will increase if not properly pre -planned and regulated. Appropriate locations and opportunities for differing uses must be pre -established through a Comprehensive Plan which does not over or under allocate the sizing of areas. Moreover, development regulations, primarily subdivision and zoning, must establish districts and performance criteria which adequately protect one use - from another. The extent of detail and level of work required is again viewed as being beyond the abilities of Wright. County. The resolution of this problem therefore rests with the local community. 0 a Z � ,F N W � �� W as LL W � V �, � m !� � to N (� 3 6 09 Q r/♦ Z s� ; � sy# Z � O J aW � � ��. . � � i� -' F- _ � � o O �� . • o� �� , 2'1� c� / N tD � „IYF3 d N c } �� ..� -� '— = r. �.�- /�... �� ,.., �� i � �� N t ��•.lS,T"ll m � .mil o ►� W N H W W F.., w F— W J a O U Z LL �� 1 Z W W ..! W Z O �_ G m N 0 W a J cn II r N•t'3�V VnNSVN 5 OI %� 19 s «,� '^ w � s } `: a �, ..--- — ,i d g � N � rn � J1 `1�� I� N I, ; m .�,: � -- I Y':, ��'. � � « I h �• a � a31NV11 a31NVH ,- a��avN � � � J N = O L � ^ � N Y � T O �- aoewvr a�oivr '3Atl tf30Vf �. N NV300 N sod N O 'SVN o �� r V� '3nv a�smvow '3AV NOSVw °b �06, ro � �3nv ynoiavw . �iL � avw '3nv N0� 'd' S N 5 ' xnvae vi '3�v ae vi co N N N 5 o m •anv a3�ovN 1~/1 N � N •3nv a3owr n � (V , � I'. s N In v � 0 o 3�Vn0 J M •3nV OaVNOVd M N OOOMNVO N M GI M b �3�V a3k3Vl• u7 r7 F- UN =N �. W ZU U W o�a P�{�++ :i Z lL F- Z W J tug 'a W m. -' a J a Z 0 W in d u a3iavN N tq vyo N � .q m a N .y N O a 3 a :jr c0 N � 7 j u°. '�'^ o '� ,V+ � V/ � n�. � c Z °' �+ I . O (_� 'O r C a H ri a m C I'a/� V+ N Z SQ- QMM ` I r Li. N f�- ►`�- d. Transportation: Access needs grow with the increase in population. The map on the following page illustrates current street problems which exist within Otsego. To its credit, Wright County ,has been extremely responsive to the extent possible to the transportation needs of the community.- The Town's appreciation in this regard cannot be overstated. The extent of problems are., however, beyond the County's means. To date, the Town has taken. on �as much of the responsibility as is possible to address such issues. This is demonstrated by the fact that 70 percent of the local levy is devoted to Township roads and bridges. From the problems conceptually illustrated, it is evident that this is .still inadequate. By gaining municipal status, however, state aid highway funds, estimated at $250,000 to $300,000 annually by the Town Engineer, will become available to Otsego. These state directed "urban" funds are seen as critical for the community to confront the existing and projected needs. e. Park and Recreation Facilities: Previously noted in this report is the fact that the community has only one formal public park and recreational facility. The County Park, which is regionally oriented, is viewed as a highly positive community asset. This facility, however, does not meet total community and especially neighborhood park and recreational opportunity needs. This problem .grows as development continues. If a more local focus is to be accomplished, plus means provided to achieve such an end, the conununity will have to gain. control of the subdivision process and the park dedication provisions. Lacking this, there is no means to resolve the problem. f. Schools: While schools are not the responsibility of Otsego, regardless of whether it is a town or municipality, there is need for coordination and cooperation between the local government and the School District. In Otsego's case, this involves three independent school districts. As Otsego grows, this needed relationship is increased. To be meaningful, however, there must be local control as contrasted to County control of the development process. This fact is documented by the present situation where the Elk River School District is looking to locate a "middle" or "transitional" school, likely requiring a 40 acre site, within Otsego. As an aside this potential school siting also demonstrates the increasing urban character and resulting service demands of Otsego. While the Town 57 • • J 6C.. G V U C� s �n�,51S',vPl U = C > „: .� d C A� � W "� ��U O m . � yU a N N h 0 '% N_ �' O O r V N �+ C d 'C7 C d Q. '� . C N U L .�i 'Q VJ �i 'ylY N.IU`+1' •� ��,v aitrvr Officials are attempting to assist School Officials, there is in fact little direction or control which can be exerted locally in this matter. Municipal statutes would serve to reverse suc h a situation. To be emphasized in' this regard is that it is not being suggested that Wright County is unresponsive to this matter. Time and capabilities are again simply a limiting factor. G. FISCAL DATA 1. Assessed Valuation: The assessed valuation of platted and unplatted property in Otsego is $48,596,100 and $60,327,000, on a respective basis. This totals a valuation for the entire conununity of $108,923,100. 2. Homestead: Homestead properties within the Township hold a 1990 market value of $97,713,700, while non -homestead properties hold a market value of $11,209,400. 3. Bonded Indebtedness: The current bond debt for Otsego is $540,000. The primary contributor to this burden was the Hall's Addition storm drainage improvement project initially costing $450,000. The balance of the debt results from road improvement projects. The table on the following page is provided for comparison purposes to generally relate the community's fiscal health. While Otsego is judged to have a very positive financial standing at present, it should be noted that reserves are being depleted as new and continuing problems are being confronted. 4. Tax (Mill) Rates: The table on page 61 indicates that the current, local Otsego tax rate is 16.754. The basis of this calculation is also provided. As a means of comparison, the table on page 62 illustrates Otsego's tax rate and that of Frankfort (Wright County) Township. Neighboring Frankfort Township is also experiencing urban development pressure for basically the same reasons as Otsego. As can be discerned from this illustrated, the Towns are relatively similar in local rates. The table on page 63 broadens the perspective of tax rates comparisons to neighboring municipalities and major urban centers in eastern Wright County. In general terms, the tax rates are reflective of the level of service provided plus the tax base which has been established. The 0 59 Q W r rn J 00 Q Ql U r-I N_ LL •--1 M O � W w } m � W Q U T W � � cn O W N � ]G W [C W J U N i- ro o rn � tL' d l0 00 N W >- O � fWJ �4- .�-I � fcn� O O O'J O ¢¢Z 'O W J O .-/ OJ CC Q C O� N F- m W rl i- ro O Ol tD N lD 00 N to W 'ct' 00 O - U 4- �-1 O� I� ]C Z O O N O W J 'O O �-I W J c� C OJ N U m W .--I In Vl F- rY W li to W � � N W Z M 00 O� N � CO I� W K O N M � F- m ct Ol Ol to O H �t M f-r Z �t r-1 �Q-- O fn VI O a -v w e o I I LL � o i I �n W o z dd Ir' I- t- to O 1- W Z = N M O W fn t.[) CO rt � In W r-� M CO Ol M � N O N �a mw rn rn a, In � O d' M H K <Y' r-I � O N N N t0 U H n M VI C VI S- ro W (� Ol i-� O r Ql t� M O_4- ro O H V• J •r v1 m �L O C •�' r1 I� i- U ro 'O Ol I.n � O Q1 L C to ri F-- � F- ro of In O N O � � W � If) O I V- U- O O I i0 O Z � Q O I� t.() � S- F- W al f\ � Ol N V' � 0.. N O Ot W M di' I� U W M M 1� K M V' .-I rf' .-I i ro M Ln r-1 N cY rn � Q� I� Ol ti7 W 4- .� OJ M - U O •--� t0 I� Y Z � dd M N Ol W J M �Y U m m M a0 H � CO �-1 O O 01 N rl M M rl N M If) r-i r-I M OJ H M � '..I O O 01 N H M M r-I N M u� .--I .-1 tf) N ,O Imo' 1 to � O t!) t0 M (� O O rl M Ol � I() N � N I U'1 N I o 0 � � t\ N O .-1 M M d' r-1 I I i7) I I t\ r\ Ql M N M H N � M � W O O cY N t0 t() M t� M .-1 O M M M d' rl N O t() O N O t to O t O O t0 O N O H M M O O ri I� M 1� � � t\ I� n M of d• rn OJ M tD � � tD d' Ql tND ClJ Ol In N N O M , .-� O r• O N Ol M V' H 4" 'I" � a --I O C c 7 O V1 O O Q1 U U a� U U ro Q' Q N U .]C O_ r •7-� VI O VI rd 4- •r M O O) N � $... rN C ..O C JW 'C H C 5-. S-. �. > N > J Q1 O Ul 41 ro ro ro O J �. m �o� �.� �� 60 t . y u a ro ^, ^ > t` n N � O H .-r � t N A. 3� 11yVV M H � "' '� � >'+ 00 00 � C N "� N N L N R1 � � z ^' ,� . 0 CC ^ � C `� � .�, 'o' in rn � p � � O � C ?� wp � M O ap w ' N M u`'i .�7' `° � �I '� � � � O O� N � � y C .�y V o0 �7' .-i N �C O`%i � � I � c+1 0� v1 c0 r�. ?, yr aNi o � v U � �o --� rn I rn a o 0 0 o� o >�+ •qJ � r� .-i i .--� �- o 00 00 0 0 � N N N � O i,l� � O �/1 61 6J C y.A � � � • � rTI jam. H L +� ' t9 u U L C C M � I 1 1 aro ro •� i � � � i i i 1 u•o _ o -d a I u •.-I yr �� >Ju w i {� °1 o u 1 v1 +-� \ O rl i .' '- �: o x .-r o 00 o w ,:, � 7 i' � :� :] ?� � v1 O � O w O JC I . "i � � �I D y� to O O � Lam:` �t. ^ti-.�-- �� U ;0 \ � � u I � 1 cri L 'd �" i o � A. x q o 0 0 o u .c •� H N N oo � ?�' t o v� v� o .c c o � rn u W N "d � � N in u� rn. w o° u r+ r-1 a c vui '� `'� u,, cn 1 i O O� N t0 rd O C � O •rl � � W C t� .-� O tial r-i N LOJ N a 'a �-1 N ,C cd N .c� n H o u v u� a� O u u C1, P-i � r-.7 H pOp td u u o ;� o c r. E-+ .b I � o v [ u >� sJ � u � O � � W cn 61 � � -mod � ti .� � o _� ... .. Q H ti u TAX RATE COMPARISON Con�nlunity-----------Otsego------_-- --------Frankiort---------••- 5chool Elk Monti- St. Michael Elk St. Micha�::l District River .cello. Albertville River Bufi:alo Albertville County 21.314 21.314 21.314 21.982 21.982 21.982 , Township 16.754 16.754 16.754 14.139 14.139 14.139 School 56.013 40.861 47.652 56.013 45.904 47.652 Hospital 2.813 2.813 2.813 N/A N/A N/A TOTAL 9G.894 81.742 88.533 92.134 82.025 83.773 TAXES ON: Home $63,300 613.34 517.43 Hobby Farm $90,060 715.66 603.75 Mobile Home Single $23,200 224.79 189.64 Mobile I�iome Double $46,000 445.71 376.01 Farm $246,100 2177.40 1836.91 560.41 583.21 519.22 530.28 G53.90 680.50 605.84 618.75 205.40 213.75 190.30 194.35 407.24 423.82 377.32 385.3G 1989.51 2070.44 1843.27 1882.55 62 1 1 >•.I � rM-I ... ono .M-I rn � � � '� � � I I 41 :I t!1 M O I Ol O� \ \ \ \ w six > ro I z z z z o � � N a W x M o M rn v1 M •-1 m r, x ••-1 S-I •-1 N •-1 O� �!' Ol - - � Lf1 M OD In w x y l v� � o � rn r-I v' � �n � FC I• 1 r-I •'� r N � r •� '-I N d' I 1 W LY rl N ul rn � r N d' z In 1D M M d' �O 00 lD L!'1 M N � O '-I N � rn w N rn oo In � SZ 4I NI O\ M O I rn N z b� In I rn rn •-1 ai N '' W O N r r � N d' u1 � d' r d' ' � x CYi O N •-1 �!'1 O �D r N w M .�-1 N •k it i� it �K I I •-1 I 1 N iJ d' d' N M M '-1 Ol O •-i O t!'1 d' d' .-1 +7' �, 1 I ro Sa -i lti tf1 •-1 M d' l0 O'� N � O N Q� tf1 lD I I .G N M r � tb U1 1 1 U .A O d' M 00 1!1 0� r r rn r A-� •r1 r�i .-i �O r N 00 lD N lf1 N �O O .--I 00 W ,"., I I to .t. �i N r-1 d' N v1 \D N d' � Cn p 1 I � 1-1 I O I d' �!' .-1 M N M O� V1 •--1 W ifl '-1 d' •-1 d' R.. 1 i71 ••i O '-I Vj lD r-i d' d' �D r o0 1D O O O� Q1 1D a I a Crl r� moo rnrn �r ter. I .tJ O N •-1 t0 O N •-1 •-1 N O N N r r� M 00 O I O .�i U N r-1 d' � 00 ul lD •"I M O U I 1 r-1 I I ' W i I d' d' M M d' d' Ol �D •-i O� V1 •-1 d' O d' H I 1 �.1 ri � r-1 '-+ o, M � � o� r o r rn •a' � .� � M r o m m M d' ui m �r rn � r r r 1 1 .-I •rl .i lD �D N lD •--i N •-1 N N d' •-1 r 00 rt� 1 N H 1 I r-1 I QI r-1• � I X ro N .i to U'1 .-I d' M '"� r 1 U .0 N M r �o I .-r � r ••� U A 1 .� M N o �n x to VJ ... rS'i N •--I d' O t11 �O N d' •" 1 U H x o o .-1 '•--I d' d' d' N O� 01 M M O I ro ro .-1 O O O d' � CO N � I W W M d' O� I r I W W 1 N N O d' tr'1 1 ^� � r-1 O� lf1 lf1 d' M O1 Ql N I CQ CQ N •-1 'd' 00 t!'1 lD .-i M Ol I � I 1 I I .-1 I I N � •-� vi in r�l o ui �n r °° 1 O ro `la � M .-� •-1 u-1 co � N � 1 .-� .0 N •-I N M 1 r M 1 r-I U A I r M M M I •a N •.� r-I •-� N r o M e' M � �o I '> In �r �i N M d' O l0 r N � N I !� '"1 1 >-1 I O o 00 00 �o rn � O o � I A Sa M aD M v'1 t0 r r N d' I p� d' N I I r-I •.i r-1 N tJ1 W 00 O U1 O d' 'I I W (L� N M U'1 O �D 00 N N ul N � O O .0 ,,, ,� z � x x ?, •� .-� � �y � ,.i ,� O o W o N N o N N o 0 � � O t� � '� O •�1 cn o 7-io .-1 r-i o .-� ri o � e~ � O a� � ?� O CL U � W al � A � •.1 CnN •-1 •>a o f~ � .� to 7 . +� .0 m to H � f~ A A t~ � A � � N � 0 o U•� o •-+ U o -� o oM o0 o•-IM o o� rod' U U � L� U U � x � H H x� x� ;ry (n N � Ca <r (-V N 7 N .b a G C ro •-+ � O ro •� (� � b � C TJ ro � a � o O o r7 O .-� o N �n •.1 � a� v u 'd 7 N W v x >`+ 0 b w � a � � ro c � •a a > a �n LI Y• w H ,IJ 1l a m a�i � a � � City of Buffalo is notable in this regard. A recent Twin Cities Citizen League report made note of this fact that the type of legal framework (town versus municipality) was not the basis for governmental cost. Tax rates are reflective of problems, needs, and demands and the balance of land use activities upon which the burden of these services rests. The table on page 63 makes special note in its current tax calculations on properties in Otsego. A tax "savings" is noted which represents potential reduction for each $50-,000 in reduced levy. This calculation has been included in recognition that should Otsego receive municipal status, it will automatically be entitled to state aid highway `� funds. The Town Engineer. has est2mated that Otsego's receipts from the State would range from $250,000 to $300,000 annually. This figure is highlighted in comparison .to the present road and bridge fund levy noted on page 61. While it is certainly not claimed that state aid highway funds will eliminate. local street cost responsibilities,,it is argued that there will be a lesser burden on the local taxpayers for this line item. This is. very definitely a positive result of Otsego gaining municipal status.. Another very important point, illustrated by the table on page 65 is the benefit of having rural and urban taxing districts within a given community. From the examples provided, the City of Elk River currently has such a taxing system and the resulting impact is readily evident. A similar system has been discussed for implementation in Otsego should municipal status be gained. H. IMPACT UPON RELATED JURISDICTIONS The potential change of Otsego from a town form of government to a municipality is seen as having no impact upon the communities of Frankfort Township, Monticello Township, Albertville, Dayton (Hennepin County), or Elk River (Sherburne County). Furthermore, the three School Districts (Monticello, St. Michael�Albertville, Elk River) which presently serve Otsego should not be negatively impacted by a change in the form of government. School Districts are however affected by increases in population which is a situation expected to continue in Otsego. This impact will, however, result regardless of whether Otsego remains a township or receives municipal status. As previously stated, however, municipal status for Otsego is viewed as enhancing cooperation and coordination between the schools and community. An impact resulting from a change in Otsego's legal status is, however, seen upon Wright County. For the most part, this is judged to be a positive situation as the County primarily in the Planning and Zoning Office and Attorneys Office will be relieved of a significant portion of case work which is presently their responsibility to complete. This work for Otsego contributed to a comparatively major proportion of all such matters handled by the Planning and Zoning Office and subsequently the Planning . Commission and County Board. To be recognized, however, is that ,such case processing does generate corresponding funds to support directly related County work. The loss, however, of these monies is not viewed as a major impact as other areas of the County are experiencing increased ..activity and will compensate for loss from Otsego. It is projected therefore that this aspect of financial impact will again be positive, avoiding the need for increased personnel to respond to Otsego p-lus other growing County. needs. Two other notable financial resources will, however, be lessened for Wright County if Otsego gains municipal status. A first very evident impact will be in park dedication funds from subdivisions ' which now go to Wright County. Two plats within Otsego in 1989 .generated approximately $13,'575.00 in park dedication fees which went to, County use. While this impact is not considered minimal, it should be recognized that an inventory of undeveloped lots does exist and the overall growth and subdivision process has slowed. Moreover, the present allocation of funds to the County is not resulting in needed localized facilities. The second area of fund loss to Wright County is in federal allocated highway monies. Although the exact figures are not available, the loss is seen as being relatively minor as the majority of highway funds which come from the State will be unaltered by Otsego changing local government classification. I. ADEQUACY OF TOWNSHIP STRUCTURE The fundamental and most major issue is Otsego's request to change its form of government as its adequacy and ability to serve its citizens as a Township. The basic premise of the incorporation position is that better service will be provided by the residents of Otsego, if the local community holds both the authority as well as responsibility to manage local affairs, respond to problems, and determine the future. Throughout the preceding sections of this report, reference has been continually made to the fact that the Town lacks authority over its destiny yet must accept the burden of responsibility for actions taken by the County. This situation is most evident in the growth management area where the rural oriented County regulations have been inadequate in addressing the urban development which has progressively taken place in Otsego since the 1960s. Due to the magnitude of growth and development which has taken place, and the rural orientation of controls has left unresolved the highly critical issues of sanitary sewer collection and treatment, storm drainage management, and strict agricultural preservation. These environmental problems are in addition to the other urban problems facing the community which ' 65 include blight, tax base, development compatibility, streets, and community facilities. These are all matters of paramount importance which must be resolved and are presently of a scale which is beyond Wright County resources. These matters. can, ` however, not continue to go unattended as the lack of management will only intensify the. problems which are now evident and make' their resolution much more difficult. The only practical and realistic approach available is to .grant the local community the powers to pursue solutions and manage the future to the fullest extent possible. Under the present governmental organizations provided for by statute, incorporation and municipal status is the only means to achieve this end. J. ANNEXATION BY OTHERS�INCORPORATION�PARTIAL INCORPORATION Geographically, Otsego is located in the far northeast .corner of Wright County (see map on following page). Its major neighbor to the south is Frankfort Township, which presently holds similar powers as that of Otsego and is therefore not viewed as an alternative in the governmental reorganization issue. This same situation applies to Monticello Township which borders Otsego on the west. The City of Albertville is also an immediately adjoining neighbor at the southwest corner of Otsego. The northern portion of Albertville is presently agricultural and borders rural portions of Otsego. As such, Albertville is physically removed from the urban sections of Otsego and offers no potential for addressing most of Otsego's major problems. Also of note is that Otsego is approximately six times larger than Albertville in population size. As such, a "consolidation" of the two communities would likely result in a loss of identity for Albertville plus a de -emphasis on the physical jurisdiction which presently constitutes that city and conununity. The City of Dayton, located in Hennepin County, borders Otsego to the east. Besides presenting the problem posed by two County jurisdictions, Dayton offers no major urban services necessary to address the critical issues confronting Otsego. Likewise, the City of Elk River to the north is located in a County (Sherburne) other than Wright. While the City of Elk River does have urban service, a major portion of its jurisdiction (+ 70 percent) remains rural in character and lacks primary urban servicing capabilities. The City of Elk River is also concerned with maintaining its own focus and development objectives and has publicly stated its fear of "competition" from Otsego. The possibility does, however, exist and is being presently pursued for Elk River and Otsego to jointly address the sewer treatment issue at least on a temporary, interim basis. Elk River and Otsego as well as communities to the south are also cooperating on TH 101 improvement planning. Area. Location Map Sherburne Cty Elk River ---- Monticello � '• Township ; - ','•i:i Albertville St. Michael �� Frankfort Township �' Wright Cty / ri '-----� Rogers Anoka Cty Hennepin Cty Carver Cty Dayton 67 In summary, no potential is seen to exist to have some other adjoining unit of government absorb Otsego and take on the problems which must be addressed. An issue which also deserves some attention as part of the Otsego petition is whether only a portion of�the Otsego community should be incorporated and the balance left independent or joined to another jurisdiction.- As the primary focus of urban development in Otsego is in the northeast corner of the community, a split of the urban rural areas could be envisioned. Such a situation from a growth management standpoint is however not seen as advisable. Documentation in this regard is provided by recent studies of the Twin Cities Metropolitan Council. In summary, the Metropolitan Council concludes that in order to maintain effective growth management, simultaneous and coordinated control must be exercised over both urban as well as rural areas if harmonious and economic growth is to occur. Left uncontrolled, rural areas will experience continued development pressure which will simply serve to eventually extend problems and over -extend resources and geographic needs..,The Otsego situation is seen as a direct parallel to the Twin Cities Metropolitan urban/rural issue. The same reasons of having the Metropolitan Council govern both urban and rural areas, apply to the need for Otsego to maintain the integrity of its present boundaries. In this regard, agricultural preservation has been already highlighted as a major issue of the community. To properly address this issue, a unified and single local governmental entity is viewed as essential. Beyond the issue of ,governmental and growth management effectiveness and efficiency, is the consideration of the historical community identify of Otsego's long term rural residents. Another and very primary consideration is also the property tax issue. The ability to create and differentiate rural urban areas through a rural taxing district allows the Otsego community to continue as one historically based .unit, yet avoid placing the burden of urban problems on the farming uses which exist. Such an approach also facilitates the ability to preserve agricultural lands and avoids pushing the operators toward development from an economic perspective. While an urban rural split provides a balance of cost and service, it also allows maintenance of an economy of scale which benefits all within a unified jurisdiction. A final concern of a possible split in its current jurisdictional boundaries would be the potential duplication of services or the geographic "over extension" of services. Either situation is seen. as resulting in increased costs. .: K. URBAN�SUB-URBAN CHARACTER Fundamental to the Municipal Board's decision on the Otsego _ incorporation, petition is the determination of whether the community is or about to become "urban or sub -urban" in character. In this regard, the definition of what is urban and what is rural has never been precisely identified as it pertains to incorporation or annexation matters. Minnesota State Statutes (27�2.67, Subd.•1 and 2) dealing with urban and rural taxing districts do however provide a means to differentiate between the two types of activity. The definitions provided by these sources are as follows: The Rural Service District s-hall include only such unplatted lands as in the judgment of the government body at the time of the adoption of the ordinance are rural in character, and are not developed for commercial, industrial, or urban residential purposes, and for these reasons are no,t benefitted to the same degree as other land by municipal services financed by general taxation ... The Urban Service District shall include all lands within the boundaries of the city which are not included in the Rural Service District. Whenever any lot or portion of a platted parcel which is included in the Rural Service District is developed for commercial, industrial, or urban residential purposes, or basic urban services such as sewer, water, or street improvements are extended to any such lot or portion, the governing body shall transfer the entire platted parcel to the Urban Service District. Clearly on this basis, the northeast corner of Otsego must be classified as urban in character due to the type, density of development, and level of population which exists. Other "pockets" of urban development are also scattered throughout the community although the western one-half of the Town is basically rural. The simple population count of the community, near 6,000 persons, and its rank as the second largest community in Wright County .(second only to the City of Buffalo, which serves as the County Seat) also attests to the urban character of the jurisdiction, in relationship to what is typically considered rural and common to townships throughout the State. Complimenting further this interpretation is the State of Minnesota's constitution as it relates to local government role in the form of highway funds. This basis legal framework recognizes that when a local unit of government reaches 5,000 persons it should be granted responsibilities and self determination on streets and roads which are necessary to support "urban" scale populations and development. A final factor suggesting that Otsego is urban in character is the Elk River Independent School District's interest in locating a major educational facility in the community. This focus recognizes an existing and growing urban service demand. •• While it is again acknowledged that the area west of Nashua is primarily rural in character, the need for Otsego to maintain this portion of the community within its jurisdiction has been addressed in the preceding sections. A reiteration of these considerations will therefore 'not occur here. Suffice to say that the urban and rural areas are interdependent and the need exists to maintain the integrity of the existing jurisdictional boundaries. 70 ��; �� EXHIBIT .A. LEGISLATIVELY DIRECTED EVALUATION CRITERIA 71 i C 1� c J L L C C � � `' g 'J � c 'u^ o% u `� .0 c � o� G q u ro � vu 'U u v In C L C. L yi U C � '� � a`i C 'o .9 N P V V� }. O •� J .._. ro d° L •O t! tti ° 4 'a .Li O U I4., y > C L v v 1 'y 7 O O[�� U v r� O �°. P a v ro c`i O. 'C N O "w', 'D j L G 0. .� •� �� p [:.0 � •r '' � n •' 'd C C �C„ L u C U Y _ P0. � i u� p, � o O :! y p• ! ,� J 0. cf :n 7 ' O P. O 'C � U � O y FGy .�, � �r� w � [O � ly L •^' �' [). � L .� � ,; .� 4 U v 'U C rii •. C ,� ,� � u 4 ' �'. � .D C (�-� ��., p o,.i7 � "- L� 'C O °."� yU Iro 7qy . '�Ly j r�.�� p�. C��... onus �°c. o °c= :.eu.•5.op•"b•n�3��S . P. y .� C t! O g y L o � ° ": •Q• .c.[ ti ti,o o a ti 3 u � � S ro u', cv%. or iS y o�.o P•Oa ° � C �v j' C •y '�,7 y' �[/��y- K. u.O �. O.-.� O �'L7r ttl. �',. rl� OQy' ��:yi o �' � o c 3 u 7y �.� C' c.r ,o. n• n• -� �.a;,� L�v'.� u �.O c?.'a� n y ,1 L. C u C '� C C 'C 0. .O C � .0 � C y �? V q ' 6 �.. I.. � t� u .� � iA O O rJ •. :: u '' � k0 c .e 'n ' E ro '' �' S $ .G °' o y ° = cJ u G ; v 3 � :� aci •°' 3 ,'^ � 'O o 0 v�.c. n c, c--n o,%[�,u,oq'd '.onp,y o uu�' `°^y"emu GG� °°cu.nuu•n .� .. C t7 � •� � .• � O C u � O t . M u h � rOA . .n O C .0 O. '� � u .: � C '� O u' q• � � � .n q O ° I � ro v ,� .. ~ :. O '' r! C o. 'u u a" C•u q � ro � � w U��OD.DV L �i.^' } �'•O « c n 'g > .L.: c ' 'Oro v '� ° =' •O °• u 9 c [ a. a:,-y , •' ° ° •Ly 3 a. u ° iv ' u •D - _ y O �. o � [ ':� ', cu� G a! N :d � � U q , t•0 ,�j I� � .� u 'O i' `! •} , J .• '• j [ P. � � V C � 3 � y .. � '•' u h � U � v P In u � 'Jr p aaFFU aj O O ..G 'U u p • U 3 '�' � N 0. V >...y., t'Y. C . n. C-C. tL' U 4 4 .n .}. y ..>. � 3 O 'C' 4 !�}yq(,' [q •n �•.b � 'p 'O C ^. O � f' .G � , .0 U O E 'G h .w-. V N U [ r O O. ' •b � O h'' � � U ttl ,C V � � b u ' ' IL7 C u `' O O GL u S a y P. 7 u �� u P. t� � d V � C' O u L� G L I. �'. �. L! v =1 'V'O C .n [ N � U O � V_:� ❑ L. ur ['O ;}! O. M n.0 vi 'U,° O C � S'i. . r 0 O ['. "' . },... C.. ,. tl u C .ro. «O ' � R . `�y pp n 0 t: 0. 0 T7 1 .;'r., o4`u.! a�:;y.r$� Oee'! °�c^� S�'c�.y,cyu •.vn�3.c•° uo�°,%o�'t -a .. vtn o .c•_,�uOv cuPn E� �; a" � o ati•:; 'y�oav:�.�,. `a {'' r, n 5 J•.. •o [ ,L�'.n p n n � � •� u° � � `� v P. r o'� o h P. � r.. > o g� �� a ro �' u ,.; u„ o n. o a. C A L a n L L+ L� e L o bi u � 7 0 .e u •. . ,. ! n ct o >,•a � .0 5 °o. ❑ a, o. � •n ro 3 ° N � tiv :� �' . c o � a $ � E+.o r ric;l, �,o y� r°i°o_S uv�:>~'o�acc eci`u'U r.� db�°o o'S b'•y.5'oP,Cy-°c7• d o� u ,u,ro n�'• b''��`Jb onouN .b �.3 �ro,yr�.roo a,}, aurocy.°o �r.o�^� plc.cac�naAC��b�a'�ay�.�tj'�vi�:e�'xac•ti��'v�y°'C . 7 �' � � s � V ''y' t' .D L .0 � v U U O' '.^�i •U U � V U.U. p•_^' � y v0•a P. C � h .^Q �..�. � v 7 C 6'v V . • _ � '.� •r ° ,S a � v o, LP. � •S ° E: v '� � .� W •' n n u° '" '-' '�Zi, � � o E -OV. 3-Cu. n � v I, IVucl iF� ,� :. _ .,, .uc i o •�' � 'j ..{ a ' u n y' '! � ' > 3 - n � u i:' � .o n � Y' � •. J u .; •5 Syr -- u r jc .G I� ., u •v, n ' �.g`':, _� �; u � `yl c u .,o c _.c L"'a' ``� J C V 7 � �^ � �i u � o o F' 7 I � �, FI: J O ny o '� u r•a 4 c`t � nt �o �� .r u _ L E+ � o _ � 7 ;3 n' � ... C7 � C _ c �> j N .': .. := O ' � J i y r, .y v �� 7 r � m p� n' w .: c. � ro E;b.. ' a ., .� Gnu= J L '_' L O x E to • ' y T r .. u� P 7 .D v, .� > > ± � � � •n 'I: In x . � t `�)r..r�y;��i :�tiiFT�;��S"+iTi`fit'V'� �• a a u W F' c v L E ;n •E . ro :o6F s H��.03Gy 7,'i�' , •� , ... c � '° � c' ''� ,'' '' �.. ¢Luro.n•��, n yEocu,oroL .u. 0 C '� C 'D v `•�'. 'S Q� � C ro 7 C p. ed! a o o c °•° �� a ° 5 n'° 03 o'ti P E C Iy n. V+ v E t L .n h - o ._ » r L ro P. c u a u.. E 8 u a u .S u �. o r � o L 'ii ° ��' � '' a •� �� 4 0 't .. Z u � 0 0 C� . x.', o•orP!'u roue " x a_ rs •—�, �e Uw o[n��c.S 3 ..O N e u P'.: v � o.� 3 4 � O o ��..0 ab tl y S: w •'J 6 L .1 n� Ly.y a""�"r.v � �.o� ..� y,� ° m�.S j : cF,N ° ° v° LC ..: �O �r n o 'Sui.'.o'd� ab 6 �. o� a o a N a u � Q y;;. m j. .9 ,� 8 000,, >, � u� y; —.J O roc �. 4 y .-. V.0 U (. v 'q C a [ U ``u.! � rtt F ,�7 f°]. P• yn vn .0 0 n C 0. ~ } u O ..C. u •p y , N . 4 :Lw P p• � .[ L C L �� e n .. � � o "'� ',°, o o '^'o.� G.. u ... u Lao• '� o C 3 v r o �v ° 'ti w o o .� �. n � .a 3 u � C il w I c a 'n u o. •�'.' ly � � � n J J o c ,� x O u o� L '> ti ' I: "� '° ro ro C .d U U o. c' .o u � r [ 1. U � Cl u • a O .n .D c � F rj 'i7 cy •r7 O ,G s L � O" "~i' y.°o.n°.n �Ccc� .9�� ,'.yy, h o�W'�v,cy �6 ° v' o.P.or��EuC' r ,.. .. .{ j : 1 . .I ` .. ,.(t r I r .• lFri yl "• 4'Yr1�4 j�z'r i� �.4 ti (� 4'"! - %% ) IA N } l 1 .% h I tr r. �s �. " G.;^ ... ,. ! .. '• -s,r.. f� � ��II � �t :� Istktl)"C`rr!t r f4 r�S'1t '{vH4 3��y��yyri r t��ia !� § � ��d I,�'yr 7L�Et�, r. itri'�a'.'• . �Iuu�LxF..d' ..� t`ae �:k.�r,�' , n 9 �•.` � Alin _�'}�AS l•Y'_,.t*P t. tx.1Yt..xar4€.�Y.,!&fL�xf}S`,.�6 t; �•.i'rs ��i��1. �r}i��414 _ r�iL�1 4' i � r 41l � Ff 5 t�i� ri�r � 1 T I a� ` �r�. 11 'J"t '5 Eyl��;;c�'�'�'.u•.'vo"'�onr!"+.e,`+_��o�G.5Ea��q;{�3.8,�i�EaE �'��.�o c.co'Sv�4�C.aI�Kr��s�oo� �onppo ��.u"p�V �:• o% E oo �., a n� >.'-`C �:o�a'c� C; +��. . ' ppyy cs&8. 'oo cu..uc"3 uGau�I cc�,b C8'e-u ao`' �€y�' SX�u c .r O�r1�CnU C.-�'[Cp NEk �4.Y.'01i �VL C"'�°CECf'�Cr7�VU�� AH`Y O��C_q�.Cn�p�09•�-1Y G""�OLV ,!" ° q5�y p._nn opcyx nocu�c.o p,e$ n un-�$�o E•ana �+u E.. �c v`" v oo°n~��no$c�c �$u�B>t�o°°, c•o'�•°•H?'Cn�E�c}[::`y �"��>qq.c C,°p "Ju�?Ev�. o.sn„��'�`� .!'.. 'L.�1�Or�8�tac.}.y-'.2yE%cVnE>.�«'E!+o�,nse` 'cs a�s�gQ...o�op"no"sq��ir7nn•��°"�2 �' , -'� o � %; H� Fr " ° a'y u r. C=� o c s� 3 E `:c : � W, n n .. o �1 e n o• �f V p A c- �%•. CV t: u6n �ro-On60U .O L_ r ,'O,. U.C�C T" •p Up, n0`V•U.GV V„uvE N� '-2Gi "9 L'�. UO.Op��.�O�iOGHf°IVn .yJ,_.,O.G.00C°}�'SG,.,�r O�OPp-py0~•'�O O'IU'uE��`°Ks;ymu0 ' '� ,_, p".Ae ueen-n°n�tcuae"u C'E �°''s '-'�n.-9 b'eo > EG•-iuEv S�a=Le:o�.. �e V...`P,. �'. r:.. 1in��?�'�(r°+�,EC'ro'r��-dC>.��oy"c.�uo'°oe3'�uss�u'°�c a.°oovon��o°�^•�aco'�.nc>-u_-p"�s �{%:: � oa >.o ii� °A�rZ.0 v-°cu Woos.[, cs �._._ n.�c ^��"..c�uoc= A F•'N o- �: }7, �, i �OY�J EQCCyy.OJnC ., fV_m" GC•r+U rl .., i•aV E� �y `n .0 if f.n� •9 ��yV��n� � n�}C_ %:�Vi:�u•'nC 'L�H VU°9"E 1'�'OCriDG"^u�n.Cy COOpr.E ='"O"4.C_O.°�k C.O �GOnyuEOn`�'.� ifY... �o��a�se'�c^nE.EC�m��cSS'J^��p'��c,np`p-b"u.a o"Ho::•',�=�$e c„e"e"=o°c.uu-L',q''�.n +,�'. =°.•nou`u u�^�vES�'SnCo„��_n'E�Qn=-�=ariov"nEs".ct°c'L'v_:2>""xEKyr��b�n.. uOO p,�C - 'i OU6 > V `" O O U [[if V Oro. V9 E'�' L• E U'!"EuVpU `� �}Ji�.��. Or>'�L �+'Ojpif �C000 O L�.S,�n'.'°.. V.°. 'Gv [n„O CO V>..0 CLC 'S ✓S yp�u ptN L sy n L O. �+.- a .4 .. 6...G .. 4 ,n > n c .O n n V r yy ,�a•• .. U v, i n n .+ !i'a O -'- 9 n �"Cr'y'�°Et.:Fr'O�"�Cif :O ^n E��lc �•O�uo'ii ••�4•C E.".. V�n�Uy V�.�°OOp��CY U...n° nN ,�. .,� r„V a u- "eZ' v-:i _E° ��a �'oNogE'E�`nuaTc `t,+��,',' 3;,2=npnu �no.C�pp� >u �;Yuu� �y.pun•Oo��0000k.L°p'C�6'O " E _vuuy� .."3--n°o��V��c�C'�e '5 '°c�"yyY'.�nc�_.c �.0 °u .coo„oomn p'•"ro Y. •=°�n" pCpEQEQ �'�^'cs .�$�u n � :�•� �E-un-_E p�� -'�uun uq�E ��%n r co "c'eab °auxC GxRt n�c E6y Cu Co �'-cc t=Mnc f ji7,Y-C�'�'•A�O.O �.: yWVUSV.. C.OIr.V,C ��t nO� >. rCj •�n'C r°>J.CC 'p,O AyCyuC'�G ,' LL.GC�}'9pG .0 5 . 1. ;v- O ° ^'tine+o°c=p n.. s"�'•.,uo,cJ 'Ecx,y o,r7 :s-dy.oE�`ov n��=ah.c�oo 03 '° su h'So�.,c2 �c pr, f� `c:�coye oy ao u,No$o.>n,y�ge V�G He°"C �E �,uo'p:aLny°own coai,o ... �v �E.oZ .'N�cooa�E�ro�+no L O � u 3"(�� C t !�!{{ �jU C C N °YY V �. G V C O y1 y .0 C Q j' 44 n '.' %. o .y ..J. y v 0 r: � .: y N t� �. O •.°. �+ C} U p S p e o J C �' L'CCrp�^. ".".', ii .^n9 Ja O ai: �i CC."L gOOO O n€,^'CD _>.VF .Cj�>>U '"C>_U�GLOVC�07_ � r; - cvE 'E u"�oo�yu'CCXEo ��s�w^nen�� Cu'o�oo`Lr�'C�" Cn9 �[ �?�'Qaou_"'nVgp. � ci uo�uu,t -.o �y_ s �a En e° a°��^'a - m�o8v-. u,.i Eapu,."EcVV o>a �, ' � cvEu°O .c9'•6-C%L"g .}o'.., ��c a E.,, '.. p' r".=.CE ur°cam •^:own"uz°Cs.BE„� E�"y nn Epts Cc�nu F4. ; '�j g.�c.. n� s o.e °a ac�j°°N�"un G,��Nro.nssv c.mEom .��"o n,.,8 u°ro` s o.., v'-ems �y�1I 1: O �.cu'p°-noon°nzc�-v"n a_"syy.e �a'Lruo:c�.u„ So"�,uZ^m °�, ocg-��2"°gYr�': �"�`;'°! �'�N. 63 ,n g.� '°u>.n'"v,°"vN=ucc Vo1�rEo-Mu.cyo"�3Lo9o�'4s'mg'Vo=�.n,�oe vc;o-v'n€u�ap$$�� r: �:/"0.Y of �4yCno0 �7 E!1 Ub C�Ap1 �,Ov�i�Di1G �LUYU�nOUGn C.�Cr"'!rV]VUrJ •D .O NLi'i1CV �nC6L�G� 'i�.� 7; °Cau 7c �n^�.. r.0 H.5 no, ece'coo�.°u ?.°', n1. .c-s.a oao r. C v� '''v J �.'UJ C O L o'L. W % n n U n i E �:J w P.._ ... ,.. F^ L C �i 6.. O' 0. .� n ro E N E is .. S C Y VV i, �. � UEl �L.�C f7 C Cuu p.0 ": w, U.0 ..uC .. .a T.. .�: ".mn ..m ma's you.. oaoi�o,o ., .CV7.0 C��w��rn .no u'4'no.'� {-s�oQ,.. z3 cu �a��3 �3Fo-'b u o ',�._._ o s a c ov p o >,� .0 .. .c7 ` a....N .E W -- v'� o o y„o n � n C 8 e c S �r.� P� p rrJJ w o w r� E �� .„f 3._._•o .! C V O h Eh'> J C s V N ED � C N Vl � ^i .p �❑ t C` .. p >. n •' " em u 1 �ocv� Eoo>.Cu� uu w u'_' � u o� .� ooE"oCuKeC'" ur sp r; e.7 C'C .C''�4E�'b u�CS >, �>^u uCNCC='".U.O,W rnuu :p�uoo,;9 hn n'yoE"v_-,o�v o �� c > uu. >,o o �o'� E.o o.� � n o.�,E � o o e�N I CoS�n�`"GuS-o`uu�.co C� o r5 �- � ti C T) u h u O >, 0.'h 0. u 'ti7 C :. '�? � N '. �: v � .... E u n� ❑} .. � u n ,.. yo.n >,o r~'E u ro � y'Ew �v.4 .. u M o °u:� ° a ,: u�r �' coSu��o•E3'yaC'p�uu= ,'•7 7�u .: �.,y�ova'^N cG o�� r7G~ E'•„ ❑,">,..n �v„ .� cgyva�� ,y`[C Q J N A (5 L u .O a b L u h {'^ u U� (R, V O ... " a e7 .., P •1 ', •�.,., h _ O _ O ro 9 O 7 n n' 'N+ NO r+ o'y u'. o ro0 u � P.� u:.- C v � .r., .0 ,u C 7 ''ti .J �.-. :: g.EW'E uEcec°u'S c�E �'� WC.O C.Cr u_o r.0 o. C.�. >, a,v E 'U O. nF' N C o � `.i r•i o� pp±.. • o�`CCo°u�s">.0 dun n-' % a.'U ,o '�� '. .� v � Cb u L. 7 u V'OO h uu E �' x � u u :°'o., ..J '' u9•C 'ovu��3 "n'D LW�ucug .. r'7y o.G N...0 ��uo,C{"•C 4.1 �iJ� HCv �Vi-5oo�or`. `n-'Q E�� rn`°°o o. N� >r y0 � U 'ti7 u� :, C 'd O .0 •.' C V 7 w O 'o + r '' E H= u ~. c o'o p �'= c �. u W O j U ' ' 'L1 .._, V IV � ✓ E �. ._' O . un � A G C " ro C � ° rf E ._ rot'? L .D v .o Cw q Ciy O C .. C o N u u eaNccf Et „•'•-u- ,F.5 EE � �`c o'C o �ro u :' .c •.v � N u' ° C � b ..: f, nOuv'-ocoe � poso 'J ,C u u .UC �' •-' C vui 'O N h '� V h "' H b C- S U O C R �o '.'., i u _� p'aF o'„'� n'J p �� y p 'C,US i7 'vCi C�'bP.•y yop o.'�VI �.CO roi7�O.'C u'9 u��p a[V...s oo psoscon •� •� O E � ;� U � 4U. U .O G U 'U � ""' " .s P"n U•'D' .��i y h � � r7 w�' � ,C,• • ,Fc u m R v G r0 � •C � C o V � n f 1 C 7 H '> u t1 u C p Op, .�. O C .� p _b U J' F' O ? 00 � C � p . p .D .. ,"', h N LL O •n � L V �C r..,5 ��+ 'O N O. V � � P � � '`i+' .i O G C iyf 5G g C •y_ � E � � J L �Y .+, 'S) O' 1'O, � 0 fV�'1 � C U O V U 1d C � F C, f7 T7 � 'O vJ Vll !. v� O O C 9 ` " C O. � G > O � u f7 � N � E. U u U :�.0 CTJ h C ,-i o C > � u:S � •5 -��nnP o'dn" n._w .��y'v �Eu:-+�b�u�>oE 00,.03� airo.n'�r �^.,re ._c cc,^,�"-,E` n LO a vi .0 'D v C :: •D u �. u u u >, h C .D u ,p � ao �. �• ,� c "- •` ._ J ? �- tl C U : O U E N u �' C N O U n� C >o .a ..0 ,O U' >, E °` n m Q E C _.. 3" n � c C- V V V C ,>' � yf '>� � u O v O W h '� '� � W O C N u tp •Ly '• V Y .D �1 N S � V u V V� L � E" n � 3 .Oi �',y 'ciNU o �3�>a�'u��+r 'G v.5 •°o�y �.w vr",'�..i .rr77 rn�pSp :� `$�"3pY Y`c u �� ..., U O :.. 7 0% .TJ 0. u .0 r J J u .� �� >, 0 3 c> o •E v , �. p n,� M y 'u :: � u u .n . C C � 4, 0 u u v u un J .--c. "� E :n p! p�� s fin�!! U ... � o U c v� c u n c� N e o 0 o u 1c :e a u u y ,� ry� ,:; � � E ti C e '� ' c ;.: " c m o€ �' ' G� .C: Y. �-, .Q 'b 7 .O � •.• V W V U U N� Q+ w u V M .O M V 9 ...y p T C n y u O c ..... •. .b�.�u u'�S$E.a'[��pcnb:tjW.o7�' V Wpfy a:•oo.�� t5�.� q..a�,°-,euQCQS'DCvun ru7C�f1'C•VNww qi7 °�'p,,,.0 qq>,,... ri C.-. C,�M r!� P,•d ti .-: � '•�ro� ov=tG cEScu CF �°u°fie N o C >, E u 5• '� o C C 'y P... iy k .O o C c7 � C' p, U r+1 .'t' C y vi oa >, i o .. � e s � �i o o,,, s e a C .n % �. Cuo.. 'S u C.., pr,o C awv c •o c.fn'cf u u a� �^ .�,...Sn"s•�P��r�G4 GoE � o �„ ono � ��,,b'�d,>�b�„3,, m-' qq°•- a'S•xm '+�-' Lu. a. o u� o f •u u v a � � u R' •u '_ •q � a� � 7� E .0 � '� g; vi u s � o � o >. o C c E E �'v E 7 t� u o �; N z u> c u `1� n 'C ,� F a u .°v C A N kCu u to 3 u ,o n -. � s �'" � �, �� n � .n u E r C u U O h 7.r V... .C• C �! O 7 p o•o• o n cc-c asoxl V77 []. .. tD.0 C U Vlw 'U ... 'L1 r7 U � E ti C ' u N rl f`�ti 3 �S.�G uC K... ... tC p... ..0 ,f •, it , �:, : �'i.l ,I „': I :Yt�a .,. .{��"�, �}% .'�5,�f51i. �,'��' '1,�.,,y r',a,.Y �' ,t: ' Iy 5 '� .. . I ' �� f. � �i{4 I' ",i1'S5, t•�4j}"{ ;��iG 3 t it i5.�. f�� 'II j1�1� � ' ��N �+l r � �.. 1 4 � 6'I 3df + 5' ' } � , � 1/ � q' 'J� � 5 Y, 1,; a1; y , . , �t� 1� 'r r EXHIBIT B OTSEGO ADMINISTRATIVE JOB DESCRIPTIONS ��, 74 TOWN OF OTSEGO CLERK'S JOB DESCRIPTION .Jerome Perrault, Clerk - Appointed I . MEE_; A. Attend all Town Board Meetings ' B. Attend all Annual Meetings C. Attend the Board of Review Meeting D. Attend all Special Hearings and Meetings II. MINUTES AND RECORDS: A. Prepare detailed Minutes of Town Board Meetings 1) Keep Permanent File of Minutes B. Keep Minutes of the Annual Town Meeting 1) Record in Permanent Town Record Book C. Prepare detailed Annual report of the Board of Audit 1) Present at Annual Town Meeting III. CHECKS AND RECORDS: ------_ A. Prepare Payroll Checks for Twp Employees B. Prepare Verified Claim Forms for all invoices of Accounts due. 1) Present to Town Board for consideration and approval at Town Board Meeting. 2) Make out checks and mail to recipients for all Accounts Payable approved by the �� J Town Board. C. Prepare all State and Federal Withholding Tax Forms ' 1) Including Social Security Contribution forms 2) Submit to the proper offices D. Prepare and submit all PERA forms E. Prepare forms for the Annual Audit by the Worlcmens Compensation Insurance Co. F. Keep detailed records in the Clerk's Account Book of all Receipts and Disbursements of the Township. G. Prepare and submit quarterly Wage -Reports to the Minn Dept of Labor and Industry. F. Prepare and submit Annual Wage Reports to the Dept of Commerce: G. Prepare figures for a Line Item Budget for the Town IV. OTHER DUTIES PREFORMED: A. Write Burning Permits for Residents (7-days a weelc) B. Handle all phone calls pertaining to Town Business and some complaints C. Coordin: i:e with the Tovan Hall Office 7F CLERKS JOB DESCRIPTION: - Page 2 - ' . D. Coordinate with the Town Shop E. Chief Election Judge. 1) Make sure Ballots are Printed 2) Make sure all election material is ready to go for election day. 3) Coordinate with Deputy Clerk on Elections 4) Go to State Training for Elections - 5} Train our Election Judges for Town 6) Coordinate with Auditors Office F. Attend Special Township Training Courses. G. Attend Township Assoc. Meetings 1) Monthly 2) Annually 76 TOWN OF OTSEGO TOWN HALL LIST OF JOBS PERFORMED FROM HERE OFFICE EMPLOYEES: Elaine Beatty, Deputy Clerk Judy Hudson, Secretary I. PERMITS AND LICENSES ISSIIED HERE: A. Building Permits: 1) Give or Send out Bldg Permit info. Take phone calls on same 2) Write any Building Permits and Septic Permits 3) Figure square footage and total valuation ' 4) Check on site staking of lots 5) Check all ,documents and make sure all information is ready for permit • 6) Figure amount of permit and collect 7) Mail. or deliver permit application and . information to Wright Co. P & Z office 8) Record and file permits when received back from Wright Co.{Note Wright Co. Now has final decision on all permits). B. Dog Licenses: 1) Issue dog license after checking on rabies vaccination. and if spayed or. neutered. ' � 2) Get money for license to Jerry Perrault ..-� C. Burning Permits: 1) Write out burning permits either in person or from phone call 2) Coordinate same with DNR as to dry weather and any burn bans and permit books from DNR and any Special Permit needed. II. OTHER JOBS PERZ�ORMED AT THIS OFFICE: A. Special Assessments: ' 1) Get any Special Assessment Rolls Ready for the County to put on their rolls • a. Fire Assessment annually for Elk River and Albertville Fire Departments for Otsego Residents b. Any street asessments c. Any water project asessments 2) Prepare and mail special assessment searches for real estate people and title companies. 3) Set up any Special Assessment Hearings publish and post and mail out same ' 77� 'own of Otsego Town Hall - List of jobs performed here - Page 2 - �, 4) Receive payoffs. a. b�. c. ' d, checks for special assessment Write receipts Get check to Jerry Send receipt to payee Send letter to Co. to take amt. off of Assessment Rolls B. Bidding for Maintenance Dept: 1) Sealcoat Bids 2) Gravel Bids 3) Fuel Bids . C. D. a. Write Specs, and Plans b. Publish and Post bids c. Mail out glans or in person d. � Set up and attend bid opening e. Send award notices f. Send Proceed Notice g. When finished send back bid bond Otsego's newsletter: 1) Gather information 2) Write newsletter 3) Take to printer 4) Take to Buffalo ADS Agendas: 1) .. a) • 3) E. Minutes: 1) 2) 3) �� 5) F. Meetings: for newsletter for distribution Town Board Agendas Planning Commission Agendas' Building Committee Agendas .a. Gather information b. Type up agenda c. Mail out to PC & TB d. 'Get any information such as maps or special items to be discussed ready for meeting Attend PC Meeting and take minutes Type TB minutes that Jerry Perrault takes Take minutes for any special meetings and Leaders-R-Us meetings Type and file minutes of .same and mail or hand out at meetings Keep Minute Books up to date 1) Attend Town Board and PC Meetings 2) Attend Building Committee Meetings 3) Attend any Special Meetings -Hwy #101 4) Attend Worlc Meetings & Courses & Legal 5) Attend some Co. Meetings 6) Set up Special Meetings and Post . 78. . . . Town of Otsego Town Hall - List of Jobs performed here _ Page 3 - 7) Set up ,and get ready for Planning Commission and Town Board Meetings 8) Tape above meetings and transcribe some of•tapes 9) Get ready for and attend Hearings and post and publish same F. Phone Calls: 1) Coordinate calls from Atty., Planner, Engr and other .calls with the Town Board 2) Coordinate calls from persons interested in PC items with Planning Commission _ 3) Handle calls from real estate people 4) Handle calls from any residents 5) Handle Bldg. and, Zoning issues for residents 6) Handle dog complaints 7) Handle complaints on property, junk,, etc. 8) Keep in close touch with Wright Co P & Z and Environmental Health Office 9) Work with Allegra Nelson, Wright Co. Assessors Office on Special Assessments 10) Worlc with public on Zoning items and maps 11) Handle calls on grading, snowplowing and sanding from the public 12) Worlc with Developers on new plats 13) Worlc with Wright Co. Bldg. Inspector � 14)�Work with Wright Co. Hwy Engrs on roads, ;� signing, Etc. '.15 ) And more ,G. Recycling 1) Work with 4-H on Recycling Program 2) Working on a curb side program 3) Set up a special clean up day for getting ri.d of junk in Town with free tree giveaway H. Sheriff• and Deputies: 1) Work with on Roads and speeding 2) Field any complaints to them 3) File all Sheriff's Reports 4) Get Sheriff's Contract for Service to TB for signing and sending out I. Press 1) Coordinate meetings with the press 2) Meet with Press at Town Hall Office 3) Make sure special notices and meetings and Hearings get in the paper 4) Tallc to press about any upcoming items for the Town that are newsworthy . 79 . � , Town of Otsego Town Hall - List of Jobs Performed here - Page 4 - J. Billing: 1) Snowplowing billing 2) Grading billing 3) Fire service billing on car related item 4) Culvert billing K. Fax Work 1) Any documents that anyone needs in a hurry 2) Send and receive the above L. Type Letters, Minutes, Bids, Etc. (with computer) M. .Photo Copying . N. Coordinate with maintenance with radio from Town Office O. Sweep hall and steps, scrub floors and wax and keep clean and shovel walks plant flowers and tend. P. Open and sort and deal with mail and newspapers Q. .Procure supplies for -the office and paper products R. Get stamps for office and go to P.O. for mailing S. Maintain all computer files and records and minutes T. Turn all bills over to Jerry Perrault • II. Make up and give out new addresses for new properties or homes. V. Elections - give election judge training and attend meetings w/State Rep. Supervise elections and counting of ballots. Get information back to Co. III. �L'EADERS-R-IIS (Coordinate the following) j� 'A.. Vision Committee (IDENTITY) :. , 1.) Logo = Promotion Committee 2) Historical Committee 3) C�e7ebration Committee 4) Publication Committee 5) Mailbox Contest Committee B. Project Future 1) Coordinate with Minn Ext Service SI TOWN OF OTSEGO TREASURER'S JOB DESCRIPTION Jim Barthel, Clerk - Appointed I. MONIES: A. Receive all Money paid to the Town B. Deposit the. funds in Town Banlc Account C. Sign all checks II. RECORDS: �,. Keep record of Town monies received B. Keep record, of Town monies paid out C. Prepare monthly financial statements 1) Present to the Town Board 2) Prepare a yearly summary III. BANKS: A. Reconcile banlc statements B. Invest Town moneys (as directed by Tovan Board) 1 ) Deal with Banlc of Ellc River 2) Checic vaith financial institutions for interest rates IV. MEETINGS: A. Attend all Tovan Board Meetings 1) Present monthly financial statement B. Attend Town Annual Meeting 1) Attend reconveining of same C. Attend Special Town Meetings V. EDUCATION: A. Attend Tovan ship Short Courses for Treasurers B. Attend Legal Seminar C. Attend any courses that will be helpful to the Treasurer EXHIBIT C DNR CORRESPONDENCE FROht RRDZIJILL LHIJ i_iFFICE 70 '?252721 P , t7 1 STATf� OF �.CS ��4La �ERpRTIVlE�IT QF iVATI�RAl. �NR INFORMATION (612) 296-6157 July 2a, 1990 Post -It'" brand tax transmiti�l memo 7671 � or pages � / To �L1!/e.' .�,/G��-L From,?i// /;.7Gi�.LG4/!/� Co. ! � ~ coiVu/ ,.¢sso c. Cho,-�sucri Dept. PhOnGN �-$7� /rj.�4 FdX N aX N .e�Q y � ��/� 500 LAFAYETTE READ + ST, PAUL, MiNNESOTA • 55155-40 Patricia n. Lundy Assistant director Minnesota Municipal Board 165 Metro Square Building St. Paul, MN 55101 --�' �-dear Ms. Lundy: I am writing with regard to the incorporation of the Town of Otsego. While I have no objection to the incorporation, I do have some concerns with regard to Floodplain, Shoreland and Wild and Scenic Rivers Zoning that should be addressed in the incorporation process. Floodplain, Sh�oreland and Wild and Scenic Rivers zoning Ordinances need to be approved by the Department of Natural Resources before they become effective at the local level. Because this process can take 3 to 6 months to complete, the City of Otsego should declare a moratorium on any new building within the floodplain, shoreiand or wild and scenic river districts within the city or the City should enter into a joint powers agreement with the county so that, the county can continue to administer it's ordinances within the new City limits until such time as the city's ordinances are approved by the Department of. Natural Resources. ' I do not know whether it is within the authorities of the Municipal Board to require that one of these actions be taken, but we would at least ]ike a strong recommendation that one of these approaches be used to prevent any unwise development in the floodplain, shoreland or wild and scenic river districts .within the new city ]imits. . Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this incorporation. Tf you have any questions, please contact me or. Mr. Joseph Gibson of my staff at 296-2773. Sincerely, Permlts ana Lana use �ect�on ROH/JG:fw cc: Pete Otterson Dale Homuth Bill Radzwill AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLt�YER Northwest Associated Consultants, Inc. U R B A N P L A N N I N G D E S I G N M A R K E T R E S E A R C li 13 June 1990 �l Mr. Pete Otterson Division of Waters Minnesota DNR 1200 Warner Road, St. Paul, Minnesota 55102 RE: Otsego - Shoreland/Floodplain Regulations ' FILE N0: 176.08 - 90.11 Dear Mr. Otterson: Mr. Bob Kirmis of our office made contact with you with regard to a possible grant for Otsego Township as it relates to t}Ze DNR's present Shoreland Management, Program. As you pointed out, the Township is currently under T4right County .jurisdiction. The conununity is, however, actively pursuing incorporation into a mutlicipality. The Minnesota I�2unicipal Commission is in fact to hold a hearing on this request in August 1990. Assuming that Otsego does receive municipal status, it will work toward assuming a,.11 planning and zoning contacts in a gradual, coordinated fashion. The State DNR grant would greatly assist Otsego in confronting and taking on this new responsibility. In light of this pending change in status, we are grant funds will be available. Please advise. Very truly yours, NORTHWEST ASSOCIATED CONSULTANTS, INC. David R. Licht, AICP President cc: Elaine Beatty Tom Salkowski questioning if 4601 Excelsior Blvd. •Suite 410 •Minneapolis, MN 55416 • (61?_) 925-9420 •Fax 925-2721